Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

V.M. Abdul Rahman Vs. D.K. Cassim and Sons

Decided On : Dec-19-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 110 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 109, Section 110.4, the Insolvency Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 109, the Civil Procedure Code of, Section 19, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 109, Section 110, Section 109, Section 109, the Indian Act, Section 109(a

PERSON: George Lowndes, V.M. Abdul Rahman, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Majesty, O. XLI, Rule, O. XLIII, Rule 1, Cave, L.R., L.R. 60610, Ellis Cunliffe J., Rahimbhoy Hibibhoy v. turner, Syed Muzhar Husein v. Bodha Bibi, Majesty, ho, Majesty, Cave, Majesty

NORP: J.1, English

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, second, first

CARDINAL: 1, two, 1, 5,00,000, two, 2, 1, 1, 1, one, 1, 1, 23, 8, 47, 124, 22, Two, one

ORG: the Rangoon High Court, Court, the Criminal Sessions, Whereupon, Court, Council, the High Court, Lordships, Court, Court, Lordships, Court, Lordships, Court, the Appellate Court, Lordships, Board, Goverdhandas Vishindas Ratanckand, Board, Court, Court, Council, Court, Lordships, Ramchand Manjimal's, Court, Board, Board, the English Courts, Court, Court, Lordships, Court, Ramchand Manjimal's, Lordships, Council, Lordships, Lordships, the Indian Courts, Ramnchand Manjimal's, Lordships

DATE: February 13, 1929, month, March 11, 1929, April 2, April 24, April 24, April 29, 1908, June 23, 1930, 1920, 1882, 1908

GPE: India, them.12, India

PRODUCT: question.16

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //