Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ardeshir Bhicaji Tamboli Vs. Great Indian Peninsula Railway

Decided On : Nov-28-1927

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 72, the Indian Railways Act, Section 72(2, Section 72, the Indian Railways Act

DATE: February 5, 1920, February 7, 1920, February 25, November 3, 1919, 1890, 1891, 1890, February 5, 1890, February 5, 1875

CARDINAL: 128, 290, 216, 74, 74, 10,518, one, 2, two, two, two, two, seventy-four, 290, 5, seventy-four, One, 1, 1899, 1

QUANTITY: 162 bales, 74 bales, 9-2-1920

PERSON: Amalner, Kurla, Kurla, Amalner Station, Kurla Station, Railway, Jamsetji Tamboli, Jamsetji Tamboli, Dutton, Jamsetji Tamboli, Jamsetji Tamboli, Kurla, Justice Madgavkar, Reg, Reg, Russell, Majesty

ORG: Amalner, Amalner, the High Court of Judicature, Court, Owner, Railway, the G.I.P. Railway Administration, Owner, Railway, Owner, Railway Administrations, Railway, Railway, Tamboli Brothers, Board, Council, Tamboli Brothers, Lordships, Q.B. 208.7, Council, Order in Council, Council, Lordships, Council, Lordships, Lordships, Reliance, Lordships, Amainer, Lordships, the High Court of Judicature

GPE: Dhulia, Bombay, India, Jamsetji, France, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay

NORP: G.I.P. Railway

ORDINAL: First, first

FAC: the Governor-General, the Governor-General, the Governor-General, the Governor-General, the Amalner Station

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //