Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hooseini Metal Rolling Mill Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Decided On : Jan-21-1984

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item 68, Tariff Item, Tariff Item 68, Tariff Item, Tariff Item 68, Tariff Item 26B, Item 68, Tariff Item 26B. Inasmuch, Item 67, Item 68, Tariff Item 68.6, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item 26B, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item, Tariff Item

CARDINAL: 1, 26B, one, 2, 2(a, 2a, 96/75, 180, 370/76, 373/76, 674

ORG: fed, fed, the Ministry of Finance, Tariff Nomenclature, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, the Appellate Collector of Central Excise, the Government of India, the British Standard Specifications, Tariff Nomenclature, the British Standard Specifications, the Calcutta High Court, Union Carbide Co. Ltd., Sabyasachi Mukharji, The Appellate Collector, the Allahabad High Court, Geep Flashlight Industries Ltd., Union of India

DATE: 1975, 10th January, 1966, September 1975, 20th September 1975, 17th October 1975, 31st January 1976, March 1975, March 1975, March 1975, 1st March 1981, 10th May 1976, J. 1978, 29.11.1978, 1979

PERCENT: more than 50%

ORDINAL: 3rd, Secondly

GPE: Bombay, I.S.I., Allahabad

PERSON: Brussel, Brussel, Brussel, Devdhar, Rules 56A, Devdhar, H. N. Seth, V. K. Mehrotra JJ

LOC: Superintendent, Tariff Item

NORP: British

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //