Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Wadilal Chunilal Vs. Murlidhar Girdharlal Shah

Decided On : Feb-05-1970

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 817, the Indian Succession Act, Article 124 of the Limitation Act, Article 5 of the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 817, the Indian Succession Act, Section 176, the Indian Penal Code, Section 198 of that Code, the Succession Act, Section 263, Section 301, Section 317 of the Succession Act, the Succession Act, the Indian Succession Act, the Indian Succession Act ', the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Succession Act, Section 317, the Indian Succession Act, Section 317, Section 263, Section 301, the Indian Succession Act, Section 317(4, Section 263 Explanation, the Indian Succession Act, Section 317, Section 817, the Succession Act, Rule 468, Section 302, the Succession Act, Section 317, Section 263, Section 321, the Succession Act

ORG: Vimadalal, Chambers, Court, this Honourable Court, Court, Inventory, Court, Probate, Reliance, Court, Morarji v. Bai Panbai, Court, Order, Court, Chambers, Chambers, Court, Court, Order, Chambers, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Bai Panbai, the Calcutta High Court, Calcutta, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Court, Court, Legislature, Court, Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Madras High Court, Court, Court, the Lahore High Court, Reeves-Brown A.I.R.[1939] Lah, the Review Petition, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Simdari, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, so.8, Court

NORP: J.1, English, English, Indian, English

CARDINAL: one, 7, 29, 8, Two, two, 32, 666, 3, 4, 663, 92, 92, 32, one, 5,000, 100, 400, 685, 628, 636, 639, 1, 686, 685, 92, 3, 4, 1958)2MLJ230, 301, 302, 463, 8, three, 085, 636, two, one, two, 3, 4, one

PERSON: Girdharlal Nahalehand, Order, Order, L.R. 683, Order, Order, Bhabha, Bhabha, Dilip Nath, Bhabha, Order, Order, L.R., Order XLVII, Order, Rangnekar J., merits.4, Nariman, Mirza J., Morarji, L.R., Morarji, Amarsey, Amarsey, Amarsey, Mirza J., Order, Morarji, Morarji, Mirza J., Sundari Barmani, Uma Prosad, Roy Chowdhry, facie, Svndari, Mirza J., Bhabha, Mirza J., Morarji, Mirza J., Mirza J., Mirza J., Mirza J., Morarji, Nariman, Sundari, Nanjappa Asari, suo motu, Nariman, Order, Bhabha, Order, Mirza J., Morarji, Explanation, Order, Order, Bhabha, Order, Order, Order

DATE: March 20,1969, August 12,1969, 1926, March 20, 1969, March 20, 1969, 1968, 30 days, December 12, 1969, over eight months, March 20, 1969, March 20, 1969, six months, one year, 1957, 1929, 100 per month, December 20, 1920, monthly, December 11, 1925, December 20, 1923, March 20, 1969, March 20, 1969, 1957, March 20, 1969

ORDINAL: first, second, first, First, Secondly, Thirdly

PRODUCT: Yusuf v. Adullabhoy No. 1 (1929, Sundar, Report, Calcutta

GPE: Yusufs, Panbai, Panbai, Panbai, Panbai, Courts, India, India, England, Gulati

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //