Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shantez a Partnership Firm Registered Under the Indian Partnership Act and Faheen Designs a Partnership Firm, Registered Under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Vs. Applause Bhansali Films Private Limited Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 and ors.

Decided On : Mar-17-2009

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 148, the Contract Act, Order XII Rule 6, Order XII Rule 6, Order XII Rule 6, Section 70, the Evidence Act, Order 12 Rule 6, Rule 5, Order 8, Order 12, Section 115 of Evidence Act, the Indian Contract Act, Section 151, the Indian Contract Act, the Indian Contract Act, Section 152, the Indian Contract Act, Section 151

PERSON: Swatanter Kumar, Studio, Appellants, Dadar, Kumar Chawla, Order XII, Order VIII, Jalaluddin, May, Veena Kalra, Balraj Taneja, Anr, Sunil Madan, Anr, Chandra Bhattasali, Begum v. Sahebzadi, Anwar Begum, Nos, N. R. Dongre, Anr, Gorivelli Appanna, Gorivelli Seethamma

LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge

ORG: Notice of Motion No, the Plaintiffs/Appellants, Appellants, the Plaintiffs/Appellants, Respondents, Respondents, the Insurance Company, Learned Counsel, Appellants, Order XII Rule, Defendants, Appellants, Respondents, the Insurance Company, Appellants, Appellants, Respondents, Counsel for the Appellants, the Supreme Court, State of Maharashtra, Britannia Biscuits Co. Ltd., Ors, Respondents, Company, Company, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Co. Ltd., Union Bank of India, Court, Applicant, Court, Court, Court, Lucas Indian Services, Court, Order XII, Order XII Rule, Admission, Court, Court, Order XII, the Uttam Singh Duggal and, Co. v. Union Bank of India and Ors, Court, Learned Counsel, Court, CPC, Court, the Order XII, Court, the Board of Directors, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Board of Directors, Court, Court, Court, Admission, Order IX Rule, Admission, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, inter alia, Court, Court, Western Coalfields Ltd., Swati Industries, Court, Order XII Rule, Appellants, Respondents, the Insurance Company, the Police Authorities, Respondents, Sections 148, Respondents, the Insurance Company, Respondents, Appellants, Court, Respondents, Appellants, Respondents, Sections 148, Court, Manisha Commercial Ltd., Appellants, Appeal

DATE: 2007, 13th October, 2008, 1908, 18th February, 2004, 21st July, 2005, three months, 3 months, the expiry of three months, 1995, 25th May, 1996, 12th September, 1996, 8th September, 1996, 29-11-85, 1995, 1995, 1872

CARDINAL: 6, 6, 1994(5)SCALE44, one, 6, 6, 6, 5(1, 6, 6, 6, more than one, 1971]2SCR171, 8, one, 8., 12, 12, two, two, 1, 2, two, two, 5., 6, 6, 151, 152, 151

GPE: Mumbai, Bombay, Uttam

MONEY: 20 per cent

TIME: minutes

PRODUCT: Order XII, Concise, the Order XII Rule 6 of the Code

NORP: Chanchal

ORDINAL: first

FAC: Pariwar Sewa Sansthan v. Dr.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //