Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vijay JaIn Vs. Investnet Securities India Ltd.

Decided On : Jan-08-2003

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 34, Section 34 of the Act, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Chapter X, Chapter X, Section 9, the Arbitration Act, Section 34.12

PERSON: D.Y. Chandrachud, Petitioner, J.P. Goenka, J.P. Goenka, J.P. Goenka, J.P. Goenka, Petitioner, J.P. Goenka, Justice, B.N. Sri Krishna, S.A. Bobde, Reasons, H.L. Gokhale, Nishita Mhatre, H.L. Gokhale, J.P. Goenka, J.P. Goenka, Constituted Attorney.10, J., S.N. Variava, Further Bye-law, Contracts, Contracts, J.P. Goenka, J.P. Goenka

NORP: J.1, Trading

ORG: Learned Counsel, Arbitral Tribunal, the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd., the Arbitral Tribunal, Companies, the National Stock Exchange, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Ledger Account, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Ledger Account, the Bombay Stock Exchange, Stock Exchange, the Bombay Stock Exchange, Court, Vijaya Bank, Maker Development Services, Court, the Division Bench, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Parliament, The Statement of Objects, the Vijaya Bank's, Court, G. Tech Stone Ltd., Arbitration Petition No, Court, Vijaya Bank, the Ledger Account, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Bombay Stock Exchange, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Bombay Stock Exchange, the National Stock Exchange, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Ledger Account, arbitration.9, the National Stock Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, the National Stock Exchange, Court, Viraj Holdings, Motilal Oswal Securities (P.) Ltd., Arbitration Petition No, S.A. Bobde, Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, The Learned Single, the Stock Exchange, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, the Securities Contracts (Regulation, Stock Exchange, the Securities Contracts (Regulation, Parliament, the National Stock Exchange's, the Bombay Stock Exchange, Exchange, Exchange, the Governing Board, Exchange, Arbitration, Arbitration, Regulations, Arbitration, Court, the Learned Single Judges, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, D.K. Deshmukh, J. in Geetashree Securities (P.) Ltd., Vinimay Co. Ltd., the National Stock Exchange, The Learned Single, the Supreme Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, The Arbitral Award, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, The Arbitration Petition

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Single, Learned Single, Learned Single, Option Pratibhuti

DATE: 1996, 19th April, 2002, 1st April, 2001, the year 1999, August 2000, the period December 1999, March 2000, 4th June, 2000, 15th August, 2000, 4th June, 2000, the year ended 31st March, 2000, December 1999 to August 2000, March 2001, a period of, six months, 1996, 2001, 1996, 1940, 1996, 2002, 2001, 31st March, 2000, 4th June, 2000, 2000, 1956, 1956, 1956, December 1999 to August 2000, March 2001, 31st March, 2001, 6 months, 4th June, 2000, August 2000, 12th March, 2001, 31st March, 2001, 1996

PRODUCT: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

PERCENT: 10%, 18%

GPE: p.a., p.a., C.R., Kerala, Hemendra V. Shah v., the City of, Bombay

CARDINAL: 31.62, 31.39, 31.62, 14, one, 6, 3, 3, 1989]1SCR665, 284, 499, two, one, 1, 1, 3.5.1, 2, 277, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3. 5, 11, 1995)97BOMLR737, two, 3, 3, 1993]3SCR361

TIME: minutes, minutes

ORDINAL: first, third

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //