Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Kalyanji Vithaldas Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax
Decided On : Nov-30-1936
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 26A, Section 55, Section 55, Section 3 or Section, Section 55
PERSON: George Rankin, J.1, Lort-Williams, jack JJ., ISicka|________________________________________________| |Moolji Purshottam, Odhavji, Sewdas Mohan Daswife, Kalyanji, Kanji, Sewdas, Kanji, Sewdas, Kanji, Chaturbhuj, Kalyanji, Champsi, Sewdas, Moolji, Kalyanji, Kalyanji, Kalyanji, Kalyanji, Sewdas, Moolji, Lai Ram Singh v. Deputy Commissioner of Partapgarh, L.R., Sewdas, Sewdas, Laxminarayan I.L.R., L.R. 692, Benares, daughters.11, Kalyanji, Krishan Kishore, Majesty
CARDINAL: six, six, seven, six, six, two, 1, about 1912, three, four, more than one, 50, 265, one, 618, 37, one, five, 1, 1, 6, 175, 1, 255.)13
DATE: the year 1931-32, the year, September 11, 1930, any year, that year, the previous year, that year, Dec., 1919, 1919, 1919, May 1, 1930, September 11, 1930, 1923, 1935, the previous year, 1932, 1932, 1924, 1932
ORG: Moolji Sicka & Co., the High Court, The High Court, Chaturbhuj Champsiwife wife3, Moolji and Purshottam, Moolji, Lordships, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, Lordships, Moolji, Lordships, The High Court, family.10, Lordships, The Bombay High Court, Courts, Lordships, Lordships, Raja Bhunesh Pratap Narayan, United Provinces, Lordships, Crown
GPE: Gujarati, Mitakshara, daughter__________________________|, Gujarati, Kanji, Chaturbhuj, Chaturbhuj, Chaturbhuj, Chaturbhuj, Kanji, Kanji, Kanji, Bombay, Mitakshara, Vedathanni, Madras I.L.R., India, I.L.R.
NORP: Indian, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Moolji, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu
ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, first, second, second, first, second, first, first, second, second, first
WORK_OF_ART: Sewdas and Kalyanji's
LOC: Moolji, Purshottam, Moolji, Purshottam, Moolji, Purshottam