Champaklal Mohanlal Vs. the Nectar Tea Company

Decided On : Oct-13-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Civil Procedure Code, Section 49, the Indian Contract Act, Section 49, the Indian Contract Act

PERSON: Rangnekar, J.1, Surat, Surat, Surat, Surat, Surat, Surat, Shroff, Shroff, Surat, Surat, Dhunjisha Nusserwanji v. A.B. Fforde, DeSouza, Coles, Justice Holloway, Ram Lal v. Bhola Nath I.L.R., Surat, Surat, Dinshaw Mulla, Surat, Mansfield, Soniram Jeetmull, L.R., L.R., Surat, Surat

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2, 1, six, 500, 1.2, one, 7, 1, 1, 500, 2, one, 2, 475, 500, 500, 1, 1, 1, 1, 500, 1.9, 649, 652, 3, 413, 619, 104, 500, 1, 1, 1, 2, 147, 04, 1, 500, 500, 1, 500, 500, 1, 1

ORG: Jolly Bros. & Sons, Mutupalayam, Umergaum, the Surat Court, Court, Court, Court, the Surat Court, Court, the Surat Court, Court, do.6, Court, the District Court, Court, Explanation, Court, Court, Surat Court, the Surat Court, Court, Phillips v. London School Board, Ashkpitel, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, R.D. Tata & Co., Surat, Court, Court, Court

DATE: November 4, 1928, November 10, 1928, November 10, 1929, monthly, the last day of every month, 1882, As early as 1887, 1887, 1868, 1920, 1898, 1850, 1927, 265 29, 1027

GPE: Coimbatore, Ahmedabad, the Surat District, District, Bombay, Delhi, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, England, England

LOC: the Surat District, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras

MONEY: nine per cent, nine per cent

FAC: Madras, Madras

TIME: the present Code

WORK_OF_ART: Supposing A

ORDINAL: 9th, second

PRODUCT: 447