Chhaganlal Sakerlal Vs. the Municipality of Thana

Decided On : Aug-28-1931

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Match 23, 1923, Section 167, Section 167, Section 167, Section 29, the Indian Limitation Act, Act X, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 167, Section 167, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 167, the Limitation Act, Sind 93, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 187, Section 15, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 29, the Indian Limitation Act, Act X, Section 167, Section 15, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 167, Section 96, Section 96, Section 96, Section 96, Section 96, Section 92, Section 92, Section 96, Section 96, Section 96, Section 96, Section 96, Section 96, Section 98, Exhibit 89, Section 96, Section 96, the Municipal Officers, Section 98, Section 167, Section 167, Section 15, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 167, Section 15, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 29, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 167, Section 29, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 167, Section 29, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 185, Section 29, the Indian Limitation Act, Sind 93, Section 167, Section 167, Section 29, Section 15, Section 167, Section 96 of the Act, Section 96, Section 91 A., Section 96, Section 96, Section 96

PERSON: Baker, J.1, Municipality, Nos, Nos, Town Mun., Jambusar, Girjashankar, L.R., Nos, Chandra Shee, Cal, Reasons, Dropadi, Hira Lal I.L.R., Balbhaddar Singh v., Badri Sah, Chitre, Chitre, Bramwell, Balbhaddar Singh v., Badri Sah, Bowen L.J., Stevens, Stevens, Lal Ahir Gayawal, Sahai Pande, Hukam Singh, P. M. Mody v Queen Ins, Co.(1900, L.R., Munhordas v. Gokuldas, L.R., L.R., Manekchand, L.R., Town Mun, ofJambusar v. Girjashankar, L.R., malo animo, Municipal Officers, Municipality, Nos, Reasons, Dropadi, Hira Lal I.L.R., Chandra Shee, Barlee A. J. C., Lim, Nos, Municipality, Nos, Nos, malicious.8, Rander Municipality, Municipality, Ahmed Suleman, Rander Municipality, L.R., Ramji Kuber I.L.R., L.R., Baker, P. M. Mody v. Queen Ins, L.R.

ORG: Thana, Thana, the Bombay District Municipal Act, the Sanitary Inspector, the Bombay District Municipal Act, NOS, the Bombay District Municipal Act, Sati Prasad Garga, the Bombay District Municipal Act, the High Courts, the Bombay District Municipal Act, Court, The Statement of Objects, the Calcutta High Court, Court, The Privy Council, Criminal Proceedings, the Bombay District Municipal Act, the Bombay District Municipal Act, Sections 91 A and, the Bombay District Municipal Act, Court, the Bombay District Municipal Act, Sections 91 A and, the Sanitary Committee, The Sanitary Inspector, the Sanitary Committee, saying:-It, follows:-A, the Sanitary Inspector, Young & Co., Royal Leamington Spa, Cornford v. Carlton Bank, Citizens' Life Assurance Company v. Brown, A.C. 423, the Privy Council, Addison on Torts, theMunicipal, Privy Council, Abrath v. North Eastern Railway Co., Q.B., Addison on Torts, Midland Counties Railway Co., Midland Counties Railway Co., Court, Magistrate, the General Board, the General Board, The Sanitary Inspector, Court, the General Board, the Sanitary Committee, Taxes, Municipalities, Court, Court, contested.14, Court, Court, the Bombay District Municipal Act, the Statement of Objects, Sati Prasad Garga, the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Sind, the Bombay District Municipal Act, follows:-It, Court, Mulla, Court, Court, Court, SubordinateJudge, Court, the Bombay District Municipal Act, the Sanitary Committee, the General Board, Board, the Privy Council, Citizens' Life Assurance Company v. Brown, the General Board, the Sanitary Committee

GPE: Thana, Municipality, Municipality, Sections 4, Gobinda, Sections 4, Rewachand, Karachi Municipality, India, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, el., Municipality, Municipality, Varubai, Madhu, Ahmedbhai, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Nanavati, Gobinda, I.L.R., Revachand, Karachi Municipality, Bai Fatma, Municipality, Municipality, Ahmedabad Municipality, Municipality, A.C.

DATE: March 1922, July, July 17, 1928, January 7, 1924, February 16, 1924, 1905, six months, March 23, July 17, 1923.Plaintiff, January 7, 1924,Suit, February 16, 1924.5, July 17, 1923, seven months, one month's, the six months, 1922, 1828, one month's, six months, 1930, 1922, February 21, 1921, 1912, 1922, the period of one month, six months, March 23, 1923, six months, more than six months, six months, less than six months, March, 1922, July 17, 1922, 92, 8, a month, a month, a month, March 24, 1922, May 20, 1922, June 17, 1922, 92, 1923, June 1923, three months, March 23, 1923, June 13, 1923, 1923, 1923, May 20, 1922, 1883, 1904, 1883, 1854, 1854, 1902, 1903, 1903, 1905, July 10, 1922, the end of 1922, July 10, 1922, November 21, 1922, February 1, 1923, January 12, 1922, the end of March, 1922, the end of March, two months, the end of 1922, December 1922, 1924, 1922-23, 1923-24, only two months, February, March 1922, 1922, many years, July 17, 1923, 1906, six months, February 16, 1924, seven months, one month, six months', 88., the six months' period, one month's, the period of six months, 1922, a period of, six months', 1912, 1928, 1930, March 23, 1923, as sis months or, seven months, July 17, 1923, four months, the day, January 1922, several years, November 1922, the same month, November 21, 1922, over a year, May 12, 1924, the years 1922-1923, 1923-1924, January 1922, March 23, 1922, May 20, 1922, June 17, 1922, June 17, ten years later, 1924, 1911, March 1922, May 1922, one month, more than one month, several months, November 1922, October 1922, December 6, 1922, 1904

CARDINAL: 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 1923.Plaintiff, 9, 22, 805, 9, 22, one, 496, 2, 2, 1926)28BOMLR921, 28 to 42, 28, 1, 2, two, 160, 161, 2, 3, 45, 46, 3, 6, 122, 3, 4, 1, 32, 9, 1, 2, 3, 4, 81, 209, 1923.9, 46, 191, 3, 10, 517, 528, 1900, 324, 261, 161, 1926)28BOMLR921, one, 11, 410, 255, 10, 352, 10, 352, 532, 2, 4, 6, 6, 704, one, 101, 23, 195, two, 104, 210, 156, 162, 183-3, 160, 160, 500, 600, 500, 100, 600, 2, 3, one, 7, 24, 2, 9 to 18, 496, 2, 103, 2, 3, 23, 2, 2, 128, one, 2, three, 27, 61, 13, 914, 2, 3, 2, 3, 5, one, 2, one, 324

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, Secondly, first, first, first, secondly, first, first, first, first

PRODUCT: Exhibit 104

QUANTITY: 8 App, fourteen feet, eight feet, four inches

WORK_OF_ART: 8th Edition, Subordinate, Subordinate, Subordinate, Subordinate, Subordinate

NORP: Surajmal, J.1

FAC: Bombay District Municipal Act

EVENT: the Indian Limitation Act