Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Abdul Gani Sumar Vs. the Reception Committee of the 48th Indian National Congress

Decided On : Jul-22-1935

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Order I, Rule 8, the Civil Procedure Code, the Indian Arbitration Act, Order I, Rule 8, Order I, Rule 8, Section 225, Order I, Rule 8, Section 14, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 19, Section 20 of the Act, Section 14, Section 9, Section 14, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 14, Section 9 of the Code, Section 20, Section 42, Article 91 of the Indian Limitation Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, the English Arbitration Act, Section 11, Section 14, Section 14, Section 39, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 14, the Indian Arbitration Act, Order I, Rule 8, Section 100, Section 225 of the Jud. Act, Section 225 of the Act of, the Judicature Act, the Judicature Act, Section 2, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 2, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 26, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 11, the Civil Procedure Code, Order I, Rule 8, Order I, Rule 8, Order I, Rule 8, Section 14, Order I, Rule 8, Section 141, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 151 of the Code, Section 14, the Indian Arbitration Act, Order I, Rule 8, Order I, Rule 8, Order I, Rule 8, Section 14, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 151

ORG: B.J. Wadia, the Reception Committee, Indian National Congress, The Reception Committee, the Reception Committee, the Reception Committee, the Reception Committee, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation, Court, the Supreme Court of England, Court, the High Court Rules, the High Court, Court, Court, J., Court, Court, Court, Tarachand Raghavji, Sassoon & Co., I.L.R., Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Divorce, Court, Court, Rules of Court, Wallis' Trusts, Court of Justice, Court, I.L.R., the Appeal Court, Court, the Privy Council, Dun-Mussoorie Electric Tramway Co., Order IV, Rule 1, Court, Court, Legislature, Court, the Appeal Court, Rajmal Girdharlal, I.L.R., the Appeal Court, Court, the Appeal Court, the Appeal Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Reception Committee, Court, Court, Court

NORP: J.1, Hurro

CARDINAL: 21, 1, 2, 22, 1935.2, one, 9, one, 8, 459, 14, 1., 296, 23, 5., 39, 626, 406):-The, three, 897, 7, 256, 943, 20, 2, 45, 329, 22, 20 and 21, 29, 342, two, 20, 3, 20 and 21, 20, 8, 163, 172, 8

DATE: 1935, May 3, 1935, February 2, 1935, 1899, December 17, 1934, three weeks, 1925, 1932, 1932, 1922, 1889, 1922, 1920, 1873, 1925, 1888, 1917, 1868, the 1st, 1880, 1877, 1877, 1898, 1895, 1920, 1377, 1926, 1882

ORDINAL: 48th, first, 10th, 2nd

PERSON: Abidally Jafferbhai, Order XVI, Radha Kissen Khettry, V. Lukhmi, Rankin J., Mirza J, Dawlatram Mohandas, Mirza J., Ramdutt Ramkissen Das, Jai Narain-Babu, Lal v. Narain Das-Jaini Mal I.L.R., Matulal Dalmia, Ramkissen Das, Madan Gopal, Wharton, Law Lexicon, L.R., V. Jujihar Singh, Peacock C. J., Roy Chowdhry, W. R. 402, Hurryhur Saha, Hansraj Gupta V. Official Liquidators, Dinshah Mulla, Venkata Rama Reddi I.L.R., Watkins V. Fox I.L.R., Maruti Shivram, L.R., Govind, L.R., Order, Schedule II, Order, Dinshah Mulla, Dubey I.L.R.

PRODUCT: Rule 373, Rule 373

GPE: England, India, IA, Pita Ram, Parshottamdas, Kekhushrur, India

FAC: Venkata Chandrappa Nayanivaru

WORK_OF_ART: Schedule II

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //