Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bal Rajaram Padval Vs. Maneklal Mansukhbhai

Decided On : Jul-30-1931

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Exhibit 42, Exhibit 42, Exhibit 207, Exhibit 220, Exhibit 56, Section 4, chapter 5, Section 4, Clause 15, chapter 5, Section 4, Adhyaya 12, Sutras 38, Section 16, the Indian Contract Act, Section 16, the Indian Contract Act

GPE: Patkar, Lakshmibai, Bombay, Ushanas, I.L.R., L.R., Raghunathji, Brij Narain v., Brij Narain v., Bombay, I.L.R., Bombay, Dundappa, I.L.R., Ushanas, Mitakshara, Yajnavalkya, Mayukha, Khachar, Ushanas, Khachar, Khachar, Chhakauri, Mahton, Durbar, Khachar, Vyavahara, Ushanas, Mitakshara, Yajnavalkya, Mitakshara, Ushanas, Ushanas, Brihaspati, Ushanas, Ushanas, Mitakshara, Gautama, Achutara, Gautama, Chhakauri, Datta, Bombay, Brij Narain v., Jewan, Brij Narain v., Usanas, Mitakshara, Mitakshara, Mitakshara, Gautama, Yajnavalkya, Brihaspati, Usanas, Chhakauri, Mahton, Bombay, Counsel

NORP: J.1, Hindu, Ra, Hindu, Hindu, Ramkrishna Trimbak, Ramkrishna Trimbak, Vyavaharika, Girish, Hindu, Hindu, Girish, Venugopala Naidu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

CARDINAL: two, 7, 2, 1, two, 3, 4.2, 1, four, 1, one, 1, two, 25,000, 1, two, 3 and 4, 2, 6, two, 4, 1, 2, 3, 387, 546, 104, two, 4, 3.6, 3 and 4, 3 and 4, 3 and 4, 1, 1, 348, 10, 297, 1, 1, 30,000, 13,500, 15,00,000, 64,000, 3, 19i4 to 19l9, 68,148-5-10, two, 5n, 60,880-3-6, 65,508-11, 39,814-4-7, 10,219-13-11, 67,322-4, 93,378-4 1, 1,03,784, 12,278, 23,932, 92,970, 92,000, 1, 1,31,500, 28,900, 1, 62,816, 272,927, 10,229, 3,189, 5,005, 1, 7-8, 2s, 6d, 15, 16, one, 1, 1, 2, 3 and 4, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 72, 11, 1, 44, 126, 19, two, two, 1, six, 1.7,441-15, 121, 214, 1, 1, 711, 1, 376, 30, 383, 6, 612, 21, 348, 10, 5, 15, 126, 17, 612, 21, 435, 612, 21, 862Venugopala, 458, 93, 33, 113, 868, 50, 47, 47, 128, 24, 74, 155, 41, 211, 404, 376, 30, 1, 1, 320, 68, 13, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 150, 26, twenty-four, 30, 3, 60, 14, 25, thirty-six, 3, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 1, 1, 496, 14, 1931)33BOMLR825, 1, 1, 50, 73, 43, 112, 113, two, 50, three, 47, 421, 6, 393.50, 2, 3, 4, 5, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 348, 10, 247.-not, 862, 214.-not, 458, 33, 74.53, 1, 1, 1, three, 48, 149, 59, three, one, 61, three, 1931)33BOMLR825, 376, 30, one, 1, 1, 2, 376, 30, 539and, 211

PERSON: Sanjana, Rajaram Tukaram, Lakshmibai, Bal, Chimu, Nos, Tukaram Tataya, Tukaram Tatya, Tukaram Tatya, Tukaram Tatya, Bal, Chimu, Nos, Lakshmibai, Rajuram Tukaram, Bal, Chimu, Rajaram Tukaram, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Khachar v. Khachar Haraur, profits.11, Nos, L.R., Krishna Muraji, Sahu RamChandra v., Bhup Singh, L.R., L.R. 498, Sahu Ram Chandra's, Sahu Ram, lifetime.15, Exhibit 169, Bakhsh v. Dargah Pir, P.C. App, Damodaram Chetty, Bansilal Abeerchand, L.R., Achutaramayya, Ratnajee Bhootaji, Govind, Sakharam I.L.R., L.R., Kashinath v. Ganesh Annaji I.L.R., L.R. 435, Khachar v. Khachar Harsur I.L.R., L.R., Knight J., Durbar Khachar, Narayan I.L.R., L.R., Annaji I.L.R., Knight J., Narayan, Annaji I.L.R., L.R., Khachar v. Khachar Harsur, Ganga Prasad, Cal, Ramanadhan Chetty I.L.R., Gursarn Das v., Mohan Lal I.L.R., Mani, Usafali, L.R., Knight J. as ', Mookerjee J., Sadasiva Ayyar, Viramitrodaya, Smriti Chandrika, Vivadachintamani, Balambhatti, Mookerjee J., Chandra Tarkalankar, Roth, Wilson, Monier Williams, Stokes, -A son, Ratnajee Bhootaji, Kantoo Lall, Mayne, Anna, Shankarbhat, Shivappa Dundappa, L.R., Mookerjee J., Sadasiva Ayyar, J., Venugopala, Gharpure, Mookerjee J., Sadasiva Ayyar, J., caprices.27, Chintamanrav Mehendale v.Kashinath I.L.R., Vishnu v. Vishnu Narayan I.L.R., Nazir Begam, Rao Raghunath Singh, Sarju Prasad, L.R., Lal Daga v., NilmaniChaudhuri, L.R., Singh v., Nathu Ram, L.R., L.R., Radha Kishun v. Jag Sahu, Ram Bujhawan Prasad, Singh v., Nathu Ram, Revappa, Exhibit 157, Further, L.R. 385, Gadadhar v. Gangaram, Tyabji, J.38, Gharpure, Verse 47;-, is'avyavaharika, Hindoo, known.52, Khachar v. Khachar Harsur I.L.R., L.R., Roth, Wilson, Jogendra Nath Bhattacharya, Ashutosh Mookerjee J., Ganga Prasad, Cal, Vol, Sadasiva Ayyar, J., Chetty I.L.R., Apararka, Bai Mani, Usefali, Nazir Begam, Rao Raghunath Singh, L.R., Lordships, Ram Bujhawan Prasad, Singh v., Nathu Ram, Nazir Begam, Rao Raghunath Singh, Nazir Begam, Rao Raghunath Singh, Gudadhar, Shivappa Dundappa, L.R., Shivappa Dundappa, L.R., Ratnajee Bhootaji, involved.71

ORG: Thana, Thana, S. Narayan & Co., S. Narayan & Co., Rajaram, Rajaram, Rajaram, Rajaram, Rajaram, S. Narayan & Co., Court, Rajaram, S. Narayan, Co., S. Narayan, S. Narayan, Co., S. Narayan, Co., Court, Court, the District Court, S. Narayan & Co., Raja-ram, S.Narayan & Co., Rajaram, Court, Rajaram, S. Narayan & Co., Rajaram, S. Narayan & Co., Rajaram, S. Narayan & Co., the Dekkhan Agriculturists', Court, S. Narayan & Co., China Mutual Trading Co., China Mutual Trading Co., S. Narayan & Co., S. Narayan & Co., Satta, avyavaharika.12, S. Narayan & Co., S. Narayan & Co., The Bank of Bombay I.L.R., S. Narayan & Co., the Privy Council, Ratan Chand, aMitakshara, the Privy Council, Mangla Prasad, the Privy Council, Lordships, the Full Court of the Privy Council, Rajaram, Rajaram, Privy Council, K.B. Mian Karim, Venkatacharyulu, I.L.R., S. Narayan & Co., Brij Narain v., Court, the Government Servants' Conduct Rules, High Courts, Naidu, Court of Justice, Apararka, Chhkauri, Colebrooke, Vyavahara Mayukha, Knight J. as ', Court of Justice, Knight J, Court, Bhagbut Pershad, Court of Justice, the Privy Council, Court, Lordships, Court, the High Court, Court, Lordships of the Privy Council, the Privy Council, theDekkhan Agriculturists' Relief Act, the Dekkhan Agriculturists Relief Act, Court, Court, Devu, Dagdu v. Mirasaheb I.L.R., payment.36, Court, the Privy Council, Ausanasa, Mandlik, Brihaspati, the Privy Council, Apte, Judicial, The Vyavahara Mayukha, Mandlik, Court, Court, Court, Lordships, the High Court, Lordships, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Lordships, the High Court, Lordships, Court, Lordships, the High Court, Court, Lordships, Court, Lordships, Board, the Dekkhan Agriculturists' Relief Act, S. Narayan & Co., S. Narayan & Co., Privy Council, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court

DATE: 1927, six and a half, the end of 1897, the next day, 1899, 1914, 1918, June 22, 1914, April 23, 1923, six and two years of age, 2) years, October 3, 1925, 1925, August 1927, 1927, September 30, 1927, 1927, September 22, 1928, 1929, May 27, 1929, September 16, 1927, 1914, 1914 to 1925, 1908, quarterly, 1919, 1920, 1919, 1920, the previous five years, 1919, 1920, the end of 1924, 1921, 1922, 1923, 1924, the year 1924, 1918, 1914, 1919, 1920, 1921 1922, 1923, the years 1916 and, 1917, 1919, 1920, 1909, 1917, August 14, 1922, March 192, April 23,1923, 1931, 1929, June 11, 1931, 1920, 1226, 1928, 1925, 21119, 1904, 1918, 1908, former years, 47, '21, 1915, 1918, 1918, 1911, 1912, 1922, 1939, '23, 47, 15, 1925, 1874, 1928, 1914 to 1919, 1889, 1911, L.R. 116128, quarterly, 1928, 1927, quarterly, 1922, quarterly, quarterly, annual, annual, quarterly, the last day, September 30, 1927, 1922)24BOMLR370, 1879, January 18, 1927, 1912, quarterly, March 22, 1929, '40, 47, 46, 47, '49, seventy-five years ago, 1836, 1908, 1911, 1912, 1930, 54, 55, monthly, 1919, two and a half, monthly, 1928, 53967, 1928, 1925, yesterday

PRODUCT: Rajaram, Satta, Mangla Prasad, Mangla Prasad 20, Hanmant Eashinath v., Yajnavalkya, Mangla Prasad 29, Mangla Prasad, Cole

ORDINAL: first, secondly, thirdly, third, secondly, first, second, third, first, 9th, second, second, third, first, secondly, 47th, first, secondly, Thirdly, Secondly, first, first

QUANTITY: 8 per pound

MONEY: four pence, one per cent, two per cent, two per cent, twelve par cent, twelve per cent, twelve per cent, twelve per cent, six per cent, twelve per cent, twelve per cent, twelve per cent, twelve per cent

FAC: Hanmant Kashinath v., Massumat Girja Koer

WORK_OF_ART: L.R. 1 IndAp 321, Litigant

LOC: Smriti

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //