Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kunwar Jang Bahadur Vs. the Bank of Upper India, Limited

Decided On : Mar-29-1928

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 39, Section 50, Section 578 of the Code of, Section 50, Section 210, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 234 of the Code of, Section 231, Section 50 of the Code, Section 59 of the Code of, Section 41).19, Section 234 of the Code of 1882 (now Section 50, Section 578

CARDINAL: 1, 175, 1923.7, 1882.15, 1, 1908.17, two, 558, 488, 1, 466

ORG: the Court of the Judicial Commissioner of Oudh, Hardoi, Raja Durga Prasad, the Court of the Sub-ordinate, Hardoi, Lucknow, the Court of the Subordinate, Hardoi, Hardoi, the Hardoi Court, Raja Durga Prasad, Raja Durga Prasad, Hardoi, Hardoi, Raja Durga Prasad, Register, the Court of the Sale Officer, Hardoi, the Court of the Subordinate, the Collector of the District, Court, the Civil Court, the Court of, Hardoi, the Court of the Judicial Commissioner, the Hardoi Court, the Lucknow Court, the Hardoi Court, the Hardoi Court, the Hardoi Court, the Lucknow Court, the High Courts, Court, Court, the High Court of Calcutta, Court, the Cede of Civil Procedure of, Court, Bank, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Hardoi Court, Lordships

GPE: Lucknow, India, Bombay, Allahabad, India, Madhu, I.L.R, Swaminatha, Subramania

DATE: 1908, April 23, 1920, May 25, August 4, 1920, August 10, 1920, February 21, 1921, two months, the next date, January 20, 3 1/2 years, April 10, 1924, April 22, 1924, August 4, 1920, 1908, 1908, 1859, 1877, 1908, 1895, 1905, 28 Mad

PERSON: Kunwar Jang Bahadur, Kunwar Jang Bahadur's, i. e., Rajah Durga Prasad, Sham Lal Pal v., i. e., Banerjee J., Amar Chundra Banerjee, Guru Prosunmo, I.L.R, Vaidyanatha Sastri, Arnold White, Lordships, Majesty

ORDINAL: first, first

LOC: Madras

NORP: Bahadur

PRODUCT: the Full Bench

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //