Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Purshottam Thackersey Vs. K.N. Anantarama Ayyar, Commissioner of Wealth-tax and Another
Decided On : Dec-16-1983
Court : Mumbai
LAW: the W.T. Act, section 18, section 14, section 18, section 14
GPE: Pendse, India, Bombay, Anjanappa
NORP: J.1
CARDINAL: 226, 15,663, 9,222, 4,459, 6,282, two, two, two, 7,622, 7,622, 8,402, two, 3,500, three, two, 14, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 14, 1980]124ITR433(KAR, 1979]117ITR35(All
DATE: May 2, 1979, 1957, June 30, 1967-68, 1968-69, 1969-70, August 6, 1970, the assessment year 1970-71, January 1, 1972, February 2, 1979, the assessment year 1967-68, the assessment year 1968-69, the assessment year 1969, the assessment year 1970, the year 1960-61, the assessment years 1968-69, 1969-70, 1970-71, May 2, 1979, years, September 15, 1983, 1969-70, 1970-71, the assessment year 1968-69, s. 18B, the relevant year, under s. 18B
ORG: HUF, WTO, WTO, Officers, WTO, Sunderdas Thakersey & Bros Pvt. Ltd., Ashwin Properties Pvt. Ltd., Calcutta, WTO, Tribunal, WTO, WTO
PERSON: under s. 18(1)(c, under s. 18(1)(c, under s. 18(1)(c, under s. 18(1)(c, under s. 18(1)(c, Act.4, under s. 18(1)(c, May, Shri Joshi, Shri Joshi, CWT, Shareef Ahmad v. CWT