Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Purshottam Thackersey Vs. K.N. Anantarama Ayyar, Commissioner of Wealth-tax and Another

Decided On : Dec-16-1983

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the W.T. Act, section 18, section 14, section 18, section 14

GPE: Pendse, India, Bombay, Anjanappa

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 226, 15,663, 9,222, 4,459, 6,282, two, two, two, 7,622, 7,622, 8,402, two, 3,500, three, two, 14, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 14, 1980]124ITR433(KAR, 1979]117ITR35(All

DATE: May 2, 1979, 1957, June 30, 1967-68, 1968-69, 1969-70, August 6, 1970, the assessment year 1970-71, January 1, 1972, February 2, 1979, the assessment year 1967-68, the assessment year 1968-69, the assessment year 1969, the assessment year 1970, the year 1960-61, the assessment years 1968-69, 1969-70, 1970-71, May 2, 1979, years, September 15, 1983, 1969-70, 1970-71, the assessment year 1968-69, s. 18B, the relevant year, under s. 18B

ORG: HUF, WTO, WTO, Officers, WTO, Sunderdas Thakersey & Bros Pvt. Ltd., Ashwin Properties Pvt. Ltd., Calcutta, WTO, Tribunal, WTO, WTO

PERSON: under s. 18(1)(c, under s. 18(1)(c, under s. 18(1)(c, under s. 18(1)(c, under s. 18(1)(c, Act.4, under s. 18(1)(c, May, Shri Joshi, Shri Joshi, CWT, Shareef Ahmad v. CWT

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //