Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dhanraj Keshrimal Jhalani Vs. H.H. Wadia

Decided On : Sep-28-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 18, Article 18, Article 18, Article 18, the Companies Act, Article 4, Article 18, Article 38, Article 18, Article 38, Article 38, Article 24, Article 18, Article 18

PERSON: John Beaumont, Larkworthy, Articles 18, Parke B., Platt B., Parke B., Manchester Railway Company, Woodcock, Parke B., Johnson, Lyttle, George Jessel M.R., James L.J., George Jessel, Esher M.R., Amiruddin, Balaji, L.R., Setalvad, L.R. 2 Ch, George Jessel M.R., Johnson, James L.J., Wollaston, L.J. Ch, Blackwell, J.11, Setalvad, Johnson, Jessel M.R., Parke B., Jessel M.R., James L.J., Jessel M.R., Setalvad, Amiruddin, Balaji, L.R., Jessel M.R., Johnson, Esher M.R., Construing Article, Jessel M.R., Johnson, Setalvad, Johnson, Parke B., -He, Jessel M.R., Exts, Larkworthy

ORG: the Rutlam Bombay United Spinning, Weaving Co. Ltd., Palmer's Company Precedents, Directors, Directors, Directors, Enniskillen Railway Company v. Edmunds, Pollock C.B., Court, The Sheffield, Ashton, Enniskillen Railway Company v., Iran Agency, Rolls, Parliament, Parliament, the Court of Appeal, Court of Appeal, the Master of the Rolls, Cawley & Co., the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, the Court of Appeal, Rolls, Court, Pioneer Alkali Works, Bhagirath Spinning & Weaving Co., Court, Knights' Case, Advocate, Lyttle's Iron Agency, Board, view.10, Judges of, the Court of Appeal, Cawley & Co., Lyttle's Iron Agency, Parliament, Enniskillen Railway Company v. Edmunds, Exchequer, the Court of Appeal, Baggallay J.A., this High Court, Pioneer Alkali Works, Bhagirath Spining & Weaving Co., Lyttle's Iron Agency, the Court of Appeal, Cawley & Co., Lyttle's Iron Agency, Court, Lyttle's Iron Agency, M.R., J., Court

CARDINAL: 450, 1, 711, two, 118, 8, two, 5, 687, 2, 690):-Now, 42, 209, 236, two, 32, 1922.9, 321, 5, 687, 28, 721, Two, 42, 209, 5, 687, 690, 118, 122):-It, 243, two, 1926)28BOMLR411, 32, 5, 687, 42, 209, 691, 691, 1, 711

DATE: some two years, 1903, 19, 20, 24, Seven days', 1848, c. 16, 22nd, twenty-one days, 1840, 1841, 1877, 1862, December 16, 1876, the day, the day, the day, 1880, 1929, December 16, 1921, November 7, 1867, September 7, 1925, 1877, eight or nine years ago, 1859, two years, two years, 1889, 1877, the day, the day, 1848, twenty-one days, 1840, 1929, 1877, 1889, 1903

ORDINAL: first, second, third, first, first, second, first, second, third, first, second, second, third

GPE: point.5, Newry, L.J.

PRODUCT: 2 Exch, Clause 4, 2 Exch

TIME: the minute, the minute

FAC: The Great North of England Railway Company v., the Great North of England Railway Company

NORP: Mellish

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //