Abdul Satar Suleman Haji Ahmed Vs. the Advocate General of Bombay

Decided On : Sep-22-1932

Court : Mumbai

PERSON: John Beaumont, Justice Kania, Abdul Satar Suloman Haji Ahmed, Haji Ahmed Oomer, Haji Ahmed Oomer, Moseley, Justice Kania, Justice Chandavarkar, L.R. 245, ho, Manekshah, Dinshah Mulla, Mahomedan Law, Wakf, Faiz B. Tyabji, Muhammadan Law, Ameer Ali, Mahommedan Law, 4th Ed, Hamilton, Aboo Yoosaf, Baillie, Justice West, -A wakf, Pathukutti, Justice Chandavarkar, L.R. 245, Pathukutti, Baillie, Hamilton, Justice Chandavarkar, Narayan Das Aurora, Cod, Blackwell, J.15, Justice Kania, Justice Chandavarkar, L.R. 245, Justice Chandavarkar

DATE: March 9, 1923, March 9, 1923, 1880, 1905, 1881, 1889, 1905, March 9, 1922, 1905

ORG: Muhammadan law.2, the Advocate General, wakf, wakf, Muhammadan, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, wakf, wakf, Court, wakf, Court, the Advocate General, Court, Fatmabibi v. The Advocate General of, Fatmabibi v. The Advocate General of, Court, wakf, the Privy Council, wakf

CARDINAL: one, one, two, 5, 714, 12, 8, one, 136, 558, 433, 288, 565, 42, 51, 66, 8, 51, 250, Two, 8, 246, 251

GPE: Bombay, Peark, Assoobai, Bombay, Assoobai, Bombay, Assoobai

ORDINAL: second, second, third, fourth, second, third, first, second

MONEY: forty per cent, forty per cent, forty per cent, sixty per cent, sixty per cent

LANGUAGE: English

WORK_OF_ART: 2nd Edition

NORP: Abdur Rahim

EVENT: Clause 5

PRODUCT: Emnabai