Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rapidur (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others

Decided On : Oct-16-1986

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Companies Act, section 10(2, section 8(2, Section 8(2A).4, the Demand Notice of the same, Section 19, Section 11, Article 265 of the Constitution, Article 265 of the Constitution, Article 265 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution as

PERSON: Couto, Panaji, Daman, Diu, Notification, Order, Hidayatullah, Order, Nadkarni, Order, Hidayatullah, Hidayatullah, Nadkarni, Hidayatullah, Nadkarni, Hidayatullah, I.T.C. Limited, M.K. Chipkar, Nadkarni, Vyankatlal, Haryana, Banaras, Kanhaiya Lal Makund Lal Sraf, Nadkarni, Kanhaiya Lal Makund, Lal Saraf, Amar Nath Om Parkash, Jahagirdar, Nadkarni, Lordships, Chipkar, Lentin, Shah, J., Jahagirdar, Kanhaiya Lal Makund, Lal Saraf, Amar Nath Om Parkash, Madhya Bharat, Control Order, Grade E-27, Jeora Sugar Mills, Nadkarni, Hidayatullah, Kanhaiya Lal Mukund Lal Saraf, Tax, Jahagirdar, Nadkarni, Simla, Hidayatullah, Nadkarni, Hidayatullah, Hassomal Advani, Harpal Singh, Jahagirdar, J., Hassomal Advani, Harpal Singh, Hidayatullah, Hidayatullah, Hidayatullah, Hidayatullah, Nadkarni, Nadkarni, Order

NORP: J.1, b)(vi

DATE: 1956, 26th June, 1986, 30th December, 1985, the assessment years ending on 31st December, 1981, 31st December, 1982, 31st December, 1983, 31st December, 1984, 30th December, 1985, years, 1964, 2nd November, 1972, five years, 5th July, 1983, the day, 15 years', 1956, 3rd March, 1978, 28th December, 1983, the assessment year ending on 31st December, 1979, the assessment year 1979, 1978, 1983, 20th February, 1984, 13th December, 1984, 28th December, 1983, the assessment years ending on 31st December, 1981, 31st December, 1982, 31st December, 1983, 31st December, 1984, 21st December, 1984, 26th June, 1985, 31st December, 1981, 31st December, 1982, 31st December, 1983, the assessment year ending on 31st December, August, 1985, 26th June, 1985, the year ending on 31st December, 1984, the assessment years ending on 31st December, 1981, 31st December, 1982, 31st December, 1983, 31st December 1984, 30th December, 1985, the year ending on 31st December, 1984, the assessment year ending on 31st December, 26th June, 1985, 30th December, 1985, the years, 20th February, 1984, 20th February, 1984, 5.9, the year, 1979, the period 1978-1983, the year 1979, the assessment years 1981, 1982 and, 1983, 1981, 1981, 1983, 2106, 1983, 2238, 1986, 13th December, 1984, 21st July, 1986, 1362/1980, 3 years, three years, three years, several years, three years, three years, a hundred years, three years, 1985, 1948, September, 1949, 1949, 1949, 14th January, 1950, the three years, 161/85, August, 1985, August, 1982, more than three years, three years, the period of, three years, three years, three years, 21/1984, 13.12.1984, 161/85, 20th February, 1984, 161/85, four weeks, today

ORDINAL: second, second, first, first, second, second, second, first, Secondly, Thirdly, second, firstly, secondly, second, second, 5th, second, second, 3rd, 4th

ORG: Sales Tax Officer, the Notice of Demand, the Central Sales Tax, the Goa, Daman & Diu Sales Tax Act, the Union Territory of Goa, Small Scale Industries, the Directorate of Industries, Government of Goa, Daman & Diu, the Union Territory of Goa, Daman & Diu, the Goa Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Directorate of Industries, Government of Goa, Daman & Diu, the Central Sales Tax, the Sales Tax Authorities, Court, Central Sales Tax, the Central Sales Tax Act, Inter State, the Central Sales Tax, the Central Sales Tax, Inter State, the Division Bench, Writ Petition, Central Sales Tax, Inter State Sales, inter alia, the Central Sales Tax, Inter State, Central Sales Tax, Order of Assessment, the Supreme Court, Suganmal, Madhya Pradesh and Others, Atul Products Ltd., Union of India, Court, Government Advocate, the Supreme Court in Forward Construction Co., Prabhat Mandal, the Division Bench, Sales Tax, Central Sales Tax, Suganmal, the Supreme Court, Atul Products Limited's, Court, Central Sales Tax, Court, the Supreme Court, the Central Sales Tax, Suganmal, Atul Products Limited, the Central Sales Tax, State, the Supreme Court, Co., State of Mysore, Court, inter alia, Maharashtra Vegetable Products Pvt. Ltd., another v. Union of India, Wipro Products Ltd., Another v. Union of India, Leukoplast (India) Ltd. v. Union of India and Others, Golden Tobacco Company Ltd., Union of India, the Supreme Court, Sales Tax, U.P., the Central Sales Tax, Inter State, Court, Rege, Central Sales Tax, Inter State, Cawasji, the Supreme Court, State of, Court, the Supreme Court, Cawasji, the Supreme Court, Cawasji, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Orient Paper Mills Ltd., State, M/s. Shiv Shankar Dal Mills, the Supreme Court, Orient Paper Mills, Shiv Shanker Dal Mills, Central Sales Tax, Cawasji, Parle Products Limited, another v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, Cawasji, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Lordships, Court, Court, State, Lordships, Parliament, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Cawasji, Court, this High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Cawasji, the Supreme Court, Parle Products Limited, the Supreme Court, Orient Paper Mills, Shiv Shanker Dal Mills, Lordships, Jeora Sugar Mills, the Madhya Bharat Government, 5th September,, Civil Supplies, Civil Supplies, F.O.R., Madhya Bharat Government Sugar Fund, The Jeora Sugar Mills, the Madhya Bharat Government Sugar Fund, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Cawasji, the Supreme Court, Cawasji, Cawasji, the Supreme Court's, the Supreme Court, Court, Orient Paper Mills Ltd., Sales Tax, the Supreme Court, Cawasji, Cawasji, the Supreme Court, Cawasji, the Government Sugar Fund, the Supreme Court, the Jaora Sugar Mills, the Sugar Fund, Cawasji, the Supreme Court, Cawasji, Cawasji, Parle Products Limited, the Central Sales Tax, the Himachal Pradesh High Court, Himachal Conductors Private Ltd., the Himachal Pradesh High Court, the Supreme Court, Shri Vallabh Glass Works Ltd., another v. Union of India and Others, Court, Shalimar Textile Mfg, Union of India, Parle Products Limited, Cawasji, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Parle Products Limited's, Vallabh Glass Works, the Supreme Court, Cawasji, Vallabh, Vallabh Glass Works', Cawasji, Court, Parle Products, Cawasji, the Supreme Court, Auriaya Chamber of Commerce, Allahabad, Rege & Kamat, the Inter State Tax, Department, Department, upheld.23, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court

FAC: the Goa Sales Tax Act, Explanations 4

CARDINAL: 68, 21/84, 21/84, three, 21/84, 1984.5, 161/85, three, 55/86, 1984.6, three, 2, 21/84, 21/84, 1965]56ITR84(SC, 1985(22)ELT714(Bom, 21/84, 21/84, 21/84, 6,43,928.34, 21/84, 21/84, 21/84, 21/84, 21/84, 21/84, 21/84, one, 21/84, 21/84, 21/84, 21/84.11, 1978(2)ELT154(SC, 468, 531, 1985(22)ELT334(Bom, 25, 867, 21/84, 1985]3SCR561, 1985]2SCR72, 14, 1962]1SCR549, 1980]1SCR1170, 1959]1SCR1350, 1985]2SCR72, 8, 9, 10, 12, 23, 334, 39, 32.40, 14, two, 21/84, 10(c, 21/84, 42, 440, 1985]155ITR560(SC, 21/84, two, 28.9.76, two, 13.12.1984, 55/86, 55/86, 3,13,173.50, 161/85, 3,13,179.50, 55/86

WORK_OF_ART: Orders of Assessment, State of Punjab and Others, State of Punjab, The Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner, Himachal Pradesh, The Writ Petition No

GPE: C.P.C., Kamat, Vyankatlal, Vyankatlal, Orissa, Vyankatlal, so', Vyankatlal, Madhya, Vyankatlal, Vyankatlal, Vyankatlal, Vyankatlal, Vyankatlal, Vyankatlal, Vyankatlal, Vyankatlal, Vyankatlal, Vyankatlal, Panjumal, Shalimar Textiles, Pendse, Panjumal

PERCENT: 18%, 21%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //