Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jivanlal Narsi Vs. Pirojshaw R. Vakharia and Co.

Decided On : Sep-26-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Charter, the Arbitration Act, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10

PERSON: Blackwell, L.R., Miya Mahomed v. Zorabi, L.R., M.V. Desai, Hadjee Ismail, Hadjee Hubbebb, Hadjee Mahomed, Hadjee Joosub, Beng, L.R., De Souza v. Coles, Desai, Bhotica, Justice Mookerjee, Ismail Hadjee Hubbebb, Hadjee Mahomed, Hadjee Joosub, Justice Greaves, Desai, Wadia

NORP: J.1

ORG: The Advocate General, this High Court, the Original Side of the High Court, Court, the Calcutta High Court, the High Court, Justice Couch, the High Court, Court, Court, Joylall & Co., Court, Court, the Letters Patent, Court, Court, Court, the Bellary Court, this High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Letters Patent

EVENT: Clause 15, Clause 15, Clause 15

GPE: Ibrahimbhai, Bengal, I.L.R., Hadjee, Beaumont

DATE: 1831, 1909, 1874, 1868, 1920

CARDINAL: 34, 12, 14, 11, 15, 15.2, 13, 101, 3, 611

FAC: Madras

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //