The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. Ramkrishna Kulvantrai - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Dec-08-1975

Court: Mumbai

LAW: section 10, section 46, section 37, section 46, section 37, section 37, section 10, section 39'

GPE: Madon, Bombay

NORP: J.1, inter-State, inter-State

ORG: the Bombay Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Sales Tax Tribunal, the Sales Tax Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Sales Tax Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Khemka & Co., the Supreme Court, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, a State Sales Tax Act, Tribunal, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, Tribunal, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Tribunal, Central, Central, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, Central, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Central, the Central Sales Tax Act, Tribunal, Supreme Court, State, State, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Sales Tax Act, Tribunal, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court, the Central Sales Tax Act, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, the Central Sales Tax Act, Tribunal, the Bombay Sales Tax Act

DATE: 1959, 1956, the period 1st April, 1963, March, 1964, 4,53,353, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1956, six months, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1969, 1959, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1959, 1956, 1969, 1956, 1959, 1956, 1969, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1956, 1959, 1956, 1959

CARDINAL: four, 4, 2., 99,640, 99,640, 19,928, 99,640, 99,640, 3, 4, 1975]3SCR753, 5., four, 1, 2, 99,640, 3, 99,640, 99,640, 6, 1, 3, 4, 2, 99,640, two, 99,640, one, 19,928, 2, three, 8., 9, 120., 10

ORDINAL: second, first, second

PERSON: Desai, Nos, Desai, Desai, Desai