indofil Chemicals Company, Bombay and Others Vs. Kunwarsingh Madhaosingh Mahane and Another

Decided On : Dec-07-1995

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 29(1)(b, Section 9(1)(3, Section 31, Section 31, the Insecticides Act, Section 29(1, the Insecticides Act, Section 466 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 468(2)(c, Section 469 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 198 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, chapter 20, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 199 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 469 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the Insecticides Act, Rule 28

ORG: ORDER1, the Judicial Magistrate, Court, Petitioners, the Registration Committee, Company, Magistrate, Company, Magistrate, Additional Public Prosecutor, State, the State Government, A.P.P., the Government of Maharashtra, Government, Petitioners, Company, Company, Court, A.P.P., Court, Court, Counsel for the Petitioners, Chits, the Tamil Nadu Chit Funds Act, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, Court, Cri LJ, Legislature

WORK_OF_ART: Criminal Case No, the Accused No, the Accused No

DATE: 15310, 1989, 1968, 16, many years, 1972, 1982, 1983, 1987, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1983, 1987, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, many years, 1987, three years, 1968, September 1989, 15, 16, two years, 1968, six months, one year, one year, three years, one year, three years, two years, only three years, the first day, the first day, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1982, 1985, 1983, 1986, 1984, 1987, 1985, 1988, years, 1989, three years, the years, 1987, three years, 1986, 1218, 1987, 1968, 1971, every year, every year, 10 years, 10 years back, 1982, three years, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1987, 1989, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, annual, these years, 1987, two years, 1989, 1989

CARDINAL: 2., 1, 2, 14, 15, 1, 1, 7, 11-11-1986, 7, 11-11-1986, 2, 14, 3., 4., only three, two, three, two, 15 and, 16, 2, 14, 1, 2, 14, 5., 1, 2, 2, 3, 469, 1, 2, 6., four, 8, One, 2, 497, 498, 9, one, 1, 10, 11, 12, 13

ORDINAL: first, second

PERSON: Nos, Directors, Accused Nos, Dinocap, Counsel Shri V. P. Vashi, Counsel Shri V. P. Vashi, S. J. Pingulkar, Order, H. D. Shroff, G. Natarajan, Accused Nos, Accused Nos, Nos, Accused Nos, Navinchandra Gandhi v. Pushpasen Kapadia

MONEY: 468.

GPE: Sulochana v. State, Inspect

PRODUCT: Insecticides Rules

TIME: one fine morning