Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Dayaldas Kashiram Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax (Central)
Decided On : Sep-23-1942
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 66(2, Section 5 of the Act, Section 34, Section 64(3, Section 34, Section 5(5, Section 34, Section 64(1, Section 64(3, Section 33, Section 64(3, Section 5(2, Section 64(3, Section 64, Section 64(3, Section 64(3, Section 64(3, Section 30, Section 64, Section 64(3, Section 64, Section 5(4, Section 64, Section 64, Section 2, Section 64, Section 5 of the Act, Section 64, Section 3, Section 2, Section 64, Section 64, Section 205, Section 64(3, Section 64(3, Section 64(1, Section 64, Section 64, Section 5, Section 64, Section 5(4, Section 64, Section 5, Section 64
PERSON: John Beaumont, Dayaldas Kushiram, L.R., Shah, Shah, Coltman, J.13, Ordinance, Ordinance, Sind
GPE: Kt., Bombay, Bombay City, Bombay, Baluchistan, Bombay, Bombay, assessee, Bombay, Baluchistan, Bombay, Bombay Province
ORG: the Appellate Tribunal, Court, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Special Provincial Circle, Central, the Central Board of Revenue, Central, Central, Court, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Central, the Commissioner of Income-tax, Central, Central, Court, Central, Coltman, the Government of India Act, Court, Court, Court, Special Provincial Circle', Central, Court, Court
CARDINAL: four, one, 42, one, one, one, 1, 2, 1, 3, two, two, 1, 2, 2, two, 2 and 3, 3, 2).17, 4, 4
NORP: Indian, Indian, Baluchistan, Baluchistan, Baluchistan
DATE: 1922, the year 1937-38, October 8, 1937, 1929, October 21, 1938, October 31, December 20, 1938, the year 1937-38, 1938-39, 1937-38, March 9, 1938, the year, 1938-39, 1937-38, 34, April 1, 1939, years, the year 1937-38, July 12, 1939, December, 1939, December 28, 1939, July 12, 1939, 1922, July 12, 1939, July 12, 1939, 1940, the charge year 1937-38, 1937-38, 1922, 1922.To, July 12, 1939, December 20, 1938, the latter half of Section 3, December 20, 1938, 1939, October 21, 1938, 64
ORDINAL: first, second, third, first, first, third, fourth, fourth, first, second, second