D.S. Rame Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Decided On : Dec-23-1971

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Rule 161, Circular, the Evidence Act, Article entitled 'The Last Word on the Last Word', the Eleventh Edition, Constitution, the Evidence Act, the English Law, Constitution, the Evidence Act, Constitution, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act

PERSON: Vaidya, Junnar, Sd/- V. Subramanian, Singhavi, Singhavi, Art, Singhavi, Sodhi Sukhdev Singh, Rimmer, Singhavi, Joshi, Sodhi Sukhdev Singh, Duncan, Rimmer, H. W. R. Wade, Cheshire, Simon, Duncan, Reid, Pearce, Reid, Law, Phipson, Rimmer, Simon L.C., Duncan, Art, Joshi, Sodhi Sukhdev Singh, Art, Duncan, Khosla J., Art, Art, Lordships, Joshi, Government, Art, Art, Art, Singhavi, Joshi, Art, Singhavi, Sodhi Sukhdev Singh, Singhavi, Sodhi Sukhdev Singh, AIR1951Bom72, Art, Art

NORP: J.1, Hon'ble, Rules

ORG: the Bombay Civil Services Rules, Bombay State, Maharashtra Forest Service, Ghod Project, Indian Forest Service, Indian Forest Service, Government, Government, Government Circular, General Administration Department, Government, Government, Forest Department, the State Government, Government Notification, Finance Department, GCS, Maharashtra, Court, the Government of Maharashtra, Revenue, Forest Department, the review committee, the Government of Maharashtra, Revenue and, Forests Department, inter alia, the State of Maharashtra, Government, The Government of Maharashtra, Messrs. Little & Co., this Honourable Court, Rule 161, State, Government, Government, Government, Government, Court, Court, Government, the review committee, Court, the Government of Maharashtra, Forests Department, the Supreme Court, State of Punjab, Amar Chand Butail v. Union of India :, Conway, Court, the Indian Forest Service, the Supreme Court, State of Punjab, Court, Court, State, Commonwealth, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the House of Lords, Cammell Laird & Co. Ltd., Lordships, the House of Lords, Conway, the House of Lords, Law Quarterly Review, Court, Court, the House of Lords, Home, Home, Cammell Laird & Co. Ltd., Lordships, Lordships, Crown, The House of Lords', The House of Lords, the House of Lords, the Modern Law Review, Modern Law Review, Commonwealth, Court, Crown, Court, Court, Conway, Cammell Laird & Co., Court, Court, State, Court, the Supreme Court, State of Punjab, Court, State, State, State, Government, the State of Punjab, the Supreme Court, S. 162, Court, the Supreme Court, S. 162, the Supreme Court, Pepsu Government, the Pepsu Government, the Pepsu Government, Cabinet Meeting, the Public Service Commission, the Pepsu Government's, Court, the High Court, State, the Punjab High Court, State, State, State, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, the High Court, High Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Court, the Council of Ministers, the Council of Ministers, Council, Cabinet, the Public Service Commission, the Public Service Commission, S. 123, Council, the Public Service Commission, Court, the State of Maharashtra, Government, the High Court, Government, Rule 161, Government, Court, State, Court, Government, Court, Government, Government, Government, State, Court, Government, Government, Court, Court, State, State, the Supreme Court, Amar Chand Butail v. Union of India :, the State of Punjab v., the Supreme Court, Amar Chand Butail's, the Supreme Court, the State of Punjab v., the State of Punjab, 1961]2SCR371 this Court, Court, Court, State, State, State, State, Additional Solicitor-General, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Chagla, C.J. in Dinbai v. Dominion of India, State, Government and Government, Court, Government, Government, Government, the Review Committee, Government, the Review Committee, Committee, the Forest Department, Government Circular, General Administration Department, Committee, Committee, Committee, State, State, State, the Review Committee, State, the Government of Maharashtra, State

DATE: 1959, May, 1971, 1971, November 22, 1971, August 22, 1915, 1942, 1959, 1964, 1964, three years, 1961, 1965, April 9, 1971, May 11, 1968, the age of 58 years, April 30, 1971, January 15, 1969, the age of 58 years, 58 years, June 1, 1971, May 24, 1971, the age of 55 years, 1462/3049-A/62-K, 1st April, 1966, three months, later than three months, August 9, 1971, May 24, 1971, '4, 1971, 1070-D, November 23, 1970, the age of 55 years, 50 years to, 55 years, the age of 58 years, the age of 55 years, August 27, 1970, more than 55 years of age, 55, the age of 58 years, 1971, November, 1971, 1971, five years', the petitioner five years, 1968, the years 1961 and 1965, the year 1964, 1942, 1968, 1942, 1969, 1970, 1872, 1942, September 28, 1955, May 18, 1955, March 8/9, 1956, September 28, 1955, August 11, 1956, May 18, 1955, September 28, 1955, S. 123, October 15, 1956, April 1, 1966, 1964, the five years, 1965-66, 1966-67, 1967-68, 1968-69, 1969-70, 1964, five years, April 1, 1966, 1964, five years, the last five years, the 30th September, 1969, May 24th, 1971

CARDINAL: 161, 2, two, two, 226, 3., 5, 6, 4, four, 16(1, 5, 161, 6, 161(c-1, 226, 1961]2SCR371, 910, 8., 9, two, 624, 84, 171, five, at least four, five, 624, 10, 32, 143, 240, 562, two, 1, 2, 565, 562, 12, 226, 13, 1961]2SCR371, 226, 123, 162, 14, 624, 15, 1, 2, 3, 4, 16, 17, two, 18, three, 163, 3, 19, 226, 226, 20, one, 226, 21, 1, 2, 3, 4, 22, three, 226, 161(c-1, 23, 1961]2SCR371, 123, 162, 24, 25, 226, 5, 4, 226, 26, 27

ORDINAL: First, Secondly, Thirdly, fourth, first, second, first

GPE: India, England, India, H.L., England, England, Scotland, England, England, Conway, India, India, England, India, England, Rajpramukh, India, India, India, India

EVENT: Human Rights Year

TIME: the minutes, The minutes