Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sahadeo and ors. Vs. Jagannath Kashinath and anr.

Decided On : Sep-15-1949

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 419, Section 431, Section 869

PRODUCT: ORDERHemeon, Mahadeo, Mahadeo, here,'as

NORP: J.1

PERSON: Sahadeo, Krishna, Nagpur, Nagpur, Shrimati Yenu, Sahadeo, Jagannath, Laxman, Sahadeo, Jagannath, Krishna, Jagannath, Krishna, Jagannath, Jagannath, Krishna, Nagpur, V. Bansgopal, Cri L. J. 749, Nagpur

CARDINAL: two, 25, 852, 448, about 10-30 A. M., three, about 10-30 a. m, Four, 8, 419, 3, 419, 288, 30

ORG: the Court of the Appellate Magistrate, Court, Court, Jagannath (P.W. 1, Mahadeo, the Appellate Magistrate, Counsel, Counsel, the Appellate Magistrate, the Additional District Magistrate, the Appellate Magistrate, the Appellate Magistrate, Criminal P.C., Court, Appellate Magistrate, the Appellate Magistrate, Court, attache1, Court, Rang, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate

DATE: 28th September 1948, 30th July 1948, 80th May 1947, 2nd June 1947, 2nd June 1947, the same day, 80th April 1948, 12th August 1943, 12th August 1948, August 1948, September 1948, September 1948, 18th September 1943, that day, 28th September 1943, 30th July 1948', 12th August 1948, 28th September 1943

TIME: the afternoon

ORDINAL: 7th, 7th

EVENT: 25th September 1948

WORK_OF_ART: Copy of the judgment

GPE: Ibrahim v. Empero A. I.L.R. 1928

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //