Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Lasa DIn Vs. Gulab Kunwar

Decided On : Jun-21-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Article 132 of the first, the Indian Limitation Act, Article, the Indian Limitation Act, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 132, Article of the Indian Limitation Act, the English Limitation Act, Article 132, Article 132 of the Indian Limitation Act, an Indian Act, Article 132, Article 75

PERSON: George Lowndes, Srivastava J, Hasan J. agreed, Gaya Dinv, Jhumman Lal I.L.R., Banerji J. The, Gaya Din's, Shib Dayal, Ashiq Husain v.Chatarbhuj I.L.R., Grimwood Mears C.J., Sen J., Sitab Chand's, Madras, AmmaniAmma I.L.R., Banerji J., Bhishun Marwari, Lala RaghunathPrasad I.L.R., Pat, Juneswar Dass v., Mahabeer Sing, Montague Smith, Arathoont, Sitab Chand Nahar v., Hyder Malla, Banerji J, Gaya Din v. Jhumman Lal.16, Pancham, Gaya Bin's, Blanesburgh, Gaya Din v., Jhumman Lal, Shib Dayal v. Meharban, Pancham, Parikh, Blanesburgh, Wazir Hasan J., James, Majesty, Nos

NORP: J.1, English, Indian, English, Indian, Indian

LOC: the Lucknow District, the District Judge

DATE: July 26, 1912, six years, July 26, 1918, 1908, twelve years, February 28, 1928, twelve years, July 26,1918, any year, six years, the first year, twelve years, 1915, 1882, the six years' term.8, 1915, 1891, 1922, 1922, 2710, 1927, 1896, 1896, ten years later, 1906, 1877, 1916, 1930, 1859, twelve years, six years, 16, six years, half a century later, twelve years, twelve years later, February 21, 1909

CARDINAL: Twelve, 6., 60, 400, 509, 9, 328, 281, 11, 1908.12, 981, 173, two, six, six, 6, two, 18, one, 3, 2-6

GPE: Lucknow, Bombay, Narna, India, Blanesburgh, Blanesburgh, India

ORG: Court, the Chief Court of Oudh, Board, the Court of the Subordinate, Court, Court, Lordships, the Indian Courts, The Chief Court of Oudh, Allahabad, the Chief Court, Board, Allahabad, Court, the Chief Court, Richards C.J., the Court of Appeal, Reeves, Allahabad, Board, XIV of 1859, the Allahabad Court, Lordships, High Courts, Lordships, Calcutta, Allahabad, C.W.N., Lordships, the High Court, Allahabad, the High Court of Patna, Board, Board, the Oudh Courts and, Allahabad, Lordships, Board, Board, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Lordships, the High Court, High Courts of, Board, Allahabad, the High Court, Board, Allahabad, the Chief Court of Oudh, Court, Lordships, Allahabad, Lordships, the Chief Court, Lordships, Reeves, Lordships, the Allahabad Court, Court, Lordships, Allahabad, Lordships, the Chief Court of Oudh, Lordships, the Oudh Courts, the Court of the Subordinate, the District Court, the Chief Court

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first

PERCENT: twelve percent

FAC: Rup Narain Bhattacharya v. Gopi NathMandol

PRODUCT: 903

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //