Bastyan Jao Patil Vs. the Special Land Acquisition Officer

Decided On : Sep-26-1966

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 5A, Section 39, Section 6, Section 9, Section 18 of the Act, Section 40(1, Section 41(5, Section 41, Section 41, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, the Amending Act, Section 7 of the Amending Act, Section 4, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 40(1)(6, Section 4, Section 39, Section 48, Section 6, Section 48, Section 9, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6 of the Act, Section 41.and, Section 40(J)(6, Section 41, Section 6, Section 4, Section 41, Section 40, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 40(1, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 6.10, Section 7 of the Amending Act 31 of 1962, Section 7, Section 7, Section 7 of the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act 31, the Ordinance No. 3 of 1962, Section 16, Section 17(1, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 7 of the Amending Act, Section 16, Section 17(1, Section 7, the Amending Act, Section 4, Section 39, Section 41, Section 4, Section 39, Section 39, Section 39, Section 40, Section 39, Section 39, Section 40, Section 4, Section 40(1, Section 40(1, Section 4, Section 38(1, Section 4' and Sub-section, Section 4, Section 38(1, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 39, Section 39, Section 6, Section 6 and Section 37, Section 39, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4, Section 4, Section 5A or Section 40, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4, Section 4(1, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4, Section 5A, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4, Section 4, Section 39, Section 39, Section 39, Section 39, Section 39.16, Chapter VII, Section 4, Section 4, Chapter VII, Section 5A, Section 4, Section 4, Chapter VII, Section 39, Chapter VII, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 7 of the Amendment Act, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 9, Section 6.18, Section 48, Section 48, Section 36, Section 6, Government, Section 9, Section 48, Section 48, Section 21, Section 4(1, Section 48(1, Section 21, Section 4, Section 6, Section 48(1, Section 4 or Section 6, Section 6.In, Section 48, Section 6, Section 6, Section 48, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4(1, Section 6, Section 4(1, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 4(1, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4(1, Section 6, Section 4(1, Section 4(1, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4(1, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4(1, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 4, Section 5A, Section 5(2, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6 of March 24, 1961, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6.25, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 55, Section 55, Section 6, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 4, Section 6, Section 6, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4, Chapter 14, the Appellate Side Rules

ORG: S.P. Kotval, Panch Pakhadi, follows:-A Notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, M/s. Voltas Limited, the Supreme Court, Uttar Pradesh, the Supreme Court, the Allahabad High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government, the Land Acquisition Officer, the Land Acquisition (Companies) Rules, the Land Acquisition Officer, the Land Acquisition (Companies) Rules, State, State, Court, the Land Acquisition Amendment Act 31, the Supreme Court, the Land Acquisition (Companies) Rules, Sections 4 and 6, Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Sections 38 to 42 of the Act, Government, Sections 38 to 42, the Supreme Court, Government, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Sections 4 and, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, the Gujarat High Court, Government, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Sections 40(1)(b, the Collector under Section 5A, Compaq, Sections 40 and, Clauses, The State of Bombay, the Supreme Court, Reliance, State of M. P. v. V. P. Sharma, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government, Government, State of Madhya Pradesh, Sections 4, Sections 4, the State Government, Government, the Supreme Court, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, the Collector under Section 12, inter alia, Privy Council, State, L.R. 422, the Supreme Court, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Vishnu Prasad v. State of, Chhawani the Government, The Supreme Court, the Government of the State, the Supreme Court, Sections 4, Government, The Supreme Court, Vishnu Prasad's, Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Vishnu Prasad's, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Revenue Department of the Government of Gujarat, the Collector of Ahmedabad, the State Government, the High Court, the High Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Supreme Court, the State Government, The Supreme Court, Government, Government, the High Court of, the Calcutta High Court, Corporation of Calcutta, AIR1956Cal122, Court, State, Vishnu Prasad's, Vishnu Prasad's, Court, this Honourable Court, the State Government, Court, the Supreme Court, Vishnu Prasad's, Court, the Supreme Court, Government, Government, the Corporation of Calcutta's, the Gujarat High Court, State, the Supreme Court, Government, the Gujarat High Court, the Central Government, Government, Court, India Finance and Construction Co. Pvt, the State Government, The State Government, Court, Court

PERSON: Nos, Nos, District Thana, R. L. Arora v. State, Arora, Arora, Arora, ho, Thana, Arora, Arora, Arora, Arora, R. L. Arora v. State, Arora case.6, Arora, Arora, Arora, Tijoriwala, Arora, Sorabjee, Arora, P. V. Patel, Arora, Voltas Limited, Barkya Thakur, Tijoriwala, Barky, Tijoriwala, Tijoriwala, Arora, Girdharlal, Chandra Raj Singh v., Ezra, Arora, Tijoriwala, M.P. v. V.P. Sharma, Tijoriwala, Arora, V. P. Sharma, Chhawani, Chhawani, Tijoriwala, Arora, Girdharlal, Arora, Omeda Khatun, i. e., Sorabjee, Arora, Nos, Kamlakar Thakur, Mody J., Justice Mody, Jay, L. R. 320, Sorabjee

DATE: 34, 35, July 9, 1960, July 21, 1960, July 25, 1960, August 30, 1960, October 17, 1960, February 3, 1961, March 24, 1961, April 11, 1961, August 2, 1961, September 8, 1962, October 11, 1962, December 15, 1961, March 24, 1961, January 15, 1963, August 7, 1963, September 3, 1963, 1963, October 25, 1963, November 27, 1963, 1963, December 5, 1963, March 11, 1964, May 4, 1964, July 14, 1964, August 11, 1965 Government, July 21, 1960, August 11, 1965, December 15, 1961, July 21, 1960, 1962, July 20, 1962, 1962, September 12, 1962, July 20, 1962, July 21, 1960, 41, September 8, 1962, 41, July 5, 1956, December 7, 1956, December, December 7, 1956, December 7, 1956, 14, 1962, July 20, 1962, July 20, 1962, July 9, 1960, 41, 1960, a little later, September 8, 1962, August 11, 1965, 1962, 1905, March 24, 1961 under Section 6, September 8, 1962, 1897, 6, March 24, 1961, August 11, 1965, July 21, 1960, May 16, 1949, August 12, 1960, 1949, March 24, 1961, March 24, 1961, August 3, 1960, the very same day, January 31, 1961, July 18, 1961, July 18, 1961, August 14, 1964, August 28, 1964, July 18, 1961, July 18, 1961, August 14, 1'964', March 24, 1961, 6, August 11, 1965, August 11, 1965, July 14, 1964, July 21, 1960, March 24, 1961, August 11, 1965, August 11, 1965, July 14, 1964, August 5, 1964, August 11, 1965, August 11, 1965, July 21, 1960, August 11, 1965, July 21, 1960, 74, 1905, 1963, November 26, 1965, July 1'960, June 24, 1963, 1903, July 9, 1960, July 21, 1960, about eight days, April 27, 1966

CARDINAL: 1, 8, 53 and 52, 21, two, 40, 41, 771, 14, 1964]6SCR784, 41, 41, 19, 773, 40 and 41, one, 1, 2, 3, 1, 3, 766, one, 4, 766, 5, 767, 2, 6, two, 774, 41, 12, 2, 87, 6 to 37, 2, 6 to 37, 140, 154, 2, 236, 5A, 6, 5A, 5A, 2, 1, 670, 681 thatIn, 605, 239, 239, 4, eleven, two, 5A, 6, 237, 4, 5, 1965)6GLR569, 13, more than one, two, two, two, 35/5, 52, 53, 21, one, 4(2, 444, 4, 4, 5, 25.31, 5, 250, 500, One

QUANTITY: 8 acres, 486.17 acres, all 8 acres

GPE: Taluka, Notwithstanding, Bombay, Sections, Government, Babu, Babu, Sharma, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Oirdharilal, Gujarat, concerned.22, Gujarat, proceedings.27, Girdharilal, Girdharilal, Girdharilal, Girdharilal, Mangalbhai

ORDINAL: first, second, first, 5th, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, second, first, Fourthly, first, first, first, fifth, fifth, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, second, first, firstly, secondly, first, first, first, first, second, second, first, second, second, Secondly, first, first, firstly, Secondly, Thirdly

PRODUCT: Report

WORK_OF_ART: Arora-

FAC: Sections 40 and

EVENT: Section 38(1

NORP: Rules