Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sunder Dumanna Shetty Vs. K.D. Billimoria and anr.

Decided On : Apr-03-1958

Court : Mumbai

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Rule 13-A, section 33, section 33, Section 33, section 33(1)(w, section 33, section 33, section 33(1)(a, Section 33(1)(w)(i, Rule 11, Rule 12, Rule 17-A, Rule 19, Rule 19-A, Section 24-A, Rule 22, Rule 27, Rule 13-A and Rule 27, Section 33(1)(w, Rule 5, Rule 5, Section 22, Section 22, Rule 5, Section 22(3, the Section 22, Section 167, the Bombay Police Act, Section 167, the Bombay Police Act, Rule 13-A(4, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 19(6, Constitution, section 8, the Cinematograph Act, Article 19(1)(g)Ebrahim, Section 7, Article 19(1)(e, Constitution, Section 5, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article, the Ajmer Laws Regulations, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, Section 15(2, Article 19(1)(c, Constitution, Section 112, Section 112, Article 19(1)(f, Section 2(1)(b, Section 2(1)(b, Article 19(1)(d, Constitution, the Drugs Act, the Drugs Act, the Municipal Act, Section 376, Section 33(1, Section 33, the Indian Income Tax Act, the Preventive Detention Act, Section 5(7A, Section 33, Article 19(6, the Fourteenth Amendment, Rule 13-A, Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Section 66(b)-XXV 49, Section 85(i)(iii)-XXV-49, Section 110, Section 66(b, Section 110, Section 110, Rule 13-A, Article 19(1)(g, Article 14 of the Constitution and

CARDINAL: 1, 4, 4, 13, 4, 7, 10, 24, 332, 5, 11-6-1951, 7, one, 1955]1SCR686, two, one, 1954CriLJ712, 938, 231, 13, 1954]1SCR803, 4(3, 6, 813, 227, 1955]1SCR1065, 190, 1952CriLJ966, 607-608, 200, 374, two, 1, 2, 1952CriLJ510, 328, 91, 328, 91, 3, 58, 221, 58, 134, 29, 135, 30, 123, two, 1, 1957]1SCR233, 409, 1, 1957]1SCR233, one, 13, 725, 728, 30, 220, 98, 989, 100, 511, 58, one, 8, 1, 12, 1, 2, 22-8-1957, 22-8-1957, 2, 3, three, three

PERSON: Dumanna Shetty, Shauti Bhuvan Hindu Hotel, Jacob Cirefe, Rule, Sorabjee, Tendolkar, Kaniz Begum v. Commr, Misc, Sorabjee, Sorabjee, R.M. Seshardri v. Dist, Vazir Mavat, Ghulam Hasan, Order, Order, Mukherjee, Order, Order, Ganapati Singhji, Bose, Patanjali Shastri, Madras, V.G. Row, Ajmer, Mahajan J., Anwar Ali Sarkar, Harishankar Bagla v. State, the Control Order, Justice Tendolkar, Justice Bhagwati, Carr Briant, Ratanlal Gupta v. Dist, Brundaban Chandra v. State, Justice Bhagwati, Chapter IV, Harry Gundling v. City, Law Ed, Peckham, Justice Matthews, Law Ed, Marion B. Kotch v. Board, Robert M. Harries, William Ludwig Ullmann, access--, accordingly.27

FAC: Clark Road

GPE: Bombay, Bombay, Police, Bombay, the City of, the City of, the City of, the City of, India, Tanjore, Bombay, Influx, Pakistan, India, India, India, Courts, Natvarlal, Ambalal, Bombay, Govindji, Ahmedabad, Pannalal Biniraj v. Union of India, Bombay, the United States, Chicago, L Ed, Louisiana, New Orleans, New Orleans, The United States of America, L Ed, United States of America, L Ed, the United States, Bombay

ORG: the Bombay Police Act, EHL, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, Advocate General, the District Magistrate, XXXXX, liquor house, Railway, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, the Commissioner of Police, the Bombay Police Act, the Bombay Police Act, the Bombay Police Act.6, the Bombay Police Act, the Provincial Government, inter alia, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, inter alia, the Bombay Police Act, The Bombay Police Act, Advocate General, Legislature, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, State, the District Magistrate, the Provincial Government, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, the Central Government, SCR, AIR, Government, Uttar Pradesh, The Supreme Court, SCR, AIR, Order, the Commissioner of Police, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, The Supreme Court, the District Magistrate, SCR, State, SCR, Raghubir Singh v. Court of Wards, Land Records Act, XLII, Sections 6 and 7 of the Ajmer Government Wards Regulation I of, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, a Civil Court, SCR, AIR, the Court of Wards, the Court of Wards, a Civil Court, Reliance, The Jesingbhai Ishwarlal v. Emperor, the Bombay Public Security Measures Act, Court, the Bombay Public Security Measures Act, The State of West Bengal, the West Bengal Special Courts Act X, Special Courts, the Special Court, the State Government, the Special Court, SCR, AIR, SCR, AIR, under:'In, Advocate General, Madhya Pradesh, the Cotton Textile (Control of Movement, the Central Government, Textile, Textile, Advocate General, Court, Court, Court, Advocate General, Co., Municipal Corporation, Court, the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, Bom LR, AIR, follows:'In, Bom LR, AIR, Advocate General, Maxwell, the Interpretation of Statues, Justice, the Bombay Police Act, the State Government, the Commissioner of Police under Rule 13A, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, SCR, AIR, follows:'It, the Commissioner of Income Tax, the Central Board of Revenue, Court, the State Government, the State Government, the Central Board of Revenue, Court, the Commissioner of Police, the Bombay Police Act, Greater Bombay Police Forces, Police Force, Force, State, Force, the State Government, Force, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police ', Advocate General, the Supreme Court, the United States Constitution, Yick v. Hopkins, the Government of the state, Board, Louisiana Officer, Advocate General, the Supreme Court of America, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of America, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, under:'A, Court, Magistrate, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, Court, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police, the Commissioner of Police

DATE: 1951, 1954-55, 31st March 1957, 28th February 1957, the year 1957-58, 2nd August 1957, August 1957, August 1957, 2nd September 1957, the 2nd September 1957, 2nd September 1957, 1951, quays, 1)(a, 1949, 1949, 1940, 1951, 1954, 1951, 1902, 1951, 1902, 1951, 1902, 1951, 1951, 1951, 1902, 1951, 1918, 1949, 1953, 1877, 1069, '11, 1908, 1950, 1888, 1054, 1947, 1947, 1950, '14, 1948, 1946, 1940, 1949, 1951, 258-59, 1943, 1900, 1886, 1947 91, 1093, six months', six months', 1954, 1956, 12-9-1956, 20-11-1956, 1949, 1949, 41, 46, 20-11-1956, the 20th day of, November 1956, 1951, 22-8-1957, 1949, 1951, 1951, 12-9-1956, 20-11-1956, 8-5-1957

ORDINAL: 9th, 9th, first, first, third, 10th, first, first, first, second, third

EVENT: 4th September 1957, the Bombay Police Act, the Bombay Police Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Police Act, the Bombay Police Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act XXV, the Bombay Prohibition Act XXV, the Bombay Police Act, the Bombay Prohibition Act, the Bombay Police Act, the Bombay Police Act

LOC: Greater Bombay, Policy, the Port of New Orleans, Mississippi, the Port of New Orleans, Greater Bombay

NORP: Harijan, R., Mandamus

QUANTITY: less than 2,000 feet

WORK_OF_ART: Dwarks Prasad Laxmi Narain v. State of

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //