Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Trustees of the Port of Bombay Vs. Yamunabai

Decided On : Nov-08-1951

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 2(1)(n, Section 3 of the Act

ORG: Dixit, simple.(2, Alexandra Dock, the St. George's Hospital, Hamalage, Vinnyak, Court, Court, BROOKER, THOMAS BORTHWICK & SONS, AC 669.On, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Bombay Docks, the Calcutta High Court, NAWAB, Court, SINCLAIR, MUNSHI & CO. v., the House of Lords, Viscount Haldane, Court, the House of Lords, Calcutta, the House of Lords, BROOKER, THOMAS BORTHWICK & SONS, AC 669, Court, WARNER, Court

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Workmen's Compensation Act

DATE: 1923, May 13, 1950, June 22, 1950, the preceding twelve months, 1917, 3933, 1923, 1917, 1917, 1917, 1917, 1933, 1912, 1917

CARDINAL: One, 3,500, two, two, One, 3,522, ten, nine, four, one, two, one, more than nine, two, 1, 2, two, two, 49, 539, two, 127, 541):'The, two, 541, two, one, 352, 127, 49, 1906.At, 135, 136, one, 352, 372, 678, 127.It, Two, two

PERSON: Vinayak Yenku, Ho, Petigara, ho, Petigara, Petigara, Macklin J., SIMPSON v. SINCLAIR', Macklin J., Petigara, Macklin J., Petigara, Sumner, HIGHLEY, Petiga-ra's, Macklin J., Haldane, Shaw, ho, SIMPSON v. SINCLAIR', Petigara, YORKSHIRE RAILWAY v. HIGH-LEY', Sumner, Sumner, Petigara, Lord Atkin, Petigara, SIMPSON v. SINCLAIR', Petigara, Petigara, Petigara, SIMPSON v. SINCLAIR', workman, workman, SIMPSON v. SINCLAIR'

GPE: Bombay, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Bento, Vinayak, appeal.(5, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, principle.(11, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak, Vinayak

TIME: the night

ORDINAL: firstly, second, second, second, second, first

FAC: the Alexandra Dock

NORP: Indian, English, English, English

LANGUAGE: English, English

PRODUCT: SIMPSON v. SINCLAIR', SIMPSON v. SINCLAIR', SIMPSON v. SINCLAIR'

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //