Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sarala Sundari Dassya Vs. Dinabandhu Roy

Decided On : Nov-02-1943

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Indian Succession Act, Section 263, Section 283

GPE: Atkin, Bengal, Bengal, India, Judges

NORP: J.1, will.10

ORG: the High Court of Judicature, Lordships, Court, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Rajah Nilmoni Sing Deo Bahadoor, Lordships, Court, the High Court, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships, the High Court, Court, Lordships, Lordships, Lordships

FAC: Fort William

PERSON: Haralal Saha, Haralal Saha, inadvertently.6, may'-then(c, Umanath Mookerjee, L.R., Justice Mitter, Majesty

DATE: the year 1933.2, 1927, five or six years, November, 1933, the next year, February, 1933, more than six years, August, 1935, 1925, 1943

CARDINAL: one, three, 5,000, 5,000, three, one, 9, One, 70, one, two, two, at least two and a half

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, second

PRODUCT: Calcutta

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //