Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. K.M. Madan

Decided On : Nov-03-1944

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 66(1, Section 14(2, Section 16(1, Section 16, Section 7, Section 8, Section 14 and Section 15, Section 14, Section 6, Section 6, Section 16(2, Section 10, Section 16(2

PERSON: Leonard Stone, Lalita, L.R., Setalvad, Setalvad, Setalvad, L.R., Finlay, G. Kinemas, Ltd., Cook, Justice Finlay, Needham, Setalvad

GPE: Kt., Clause, India, pp, J.19, Counsel

NORP: Indian, Indian, mentioned.7, Indian, British, British

DATE: 1922, year, the year 1941-42, the accounting year, April 1, 1940, March 31, 1941, the year, the years, the year, years, the assessment year 1932-33, five seven and a half per cent, a number of years, 1926, years, years, the relevant years, 1940, year 1932-33, 1939, the year 1932-33.9, year 1932-33, the year 1932-33, the accounting year 1940-41, 1932, the years, the assessment year 1932-33, 1932-33, that year, the assessment year 1932-33, the assessment year 1932-33, a number of years, 1942-43, years, the accounting year, the year, those years, the year, the twenty 1st, five 2nd, year 1932-33, this particular year, 1940, the years, several years, the assessment year 1932-33, the year 1940-41, the year 1940-41, that year, August 31, 193d, 1940-41, the previous year, a subsequent year, the other years, the previous years, 1933, 1939, the previous assessment years, the year, evidence.25

CARDINAL: 178, 178, 26, 42, 57, 165, 166-6-11, 26, twenty-six, 192-8, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, twelve, 33.12, 192-8, 166-6-11, 28-6, 204, 28-6, 14,126, twelve, 166-6-11, 26, 178, 137, two, 26, 28-6, 8, 178, 14, 16, 14 and 16, 193, 204, 14,126, 178, 26, 178, 42, 57, 165, 26, 18, 121):I, 1, two, one, one, one, 26, 8, 158, 178

ORG: the Tata Iron and Steel Co., the High Court, the Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., Court, Court, F.B., Crown, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Tata Iron and Steel Co., Company, the High Court, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, the Incometax Authorities, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, period.18, the Appellate Tribunal, the Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., the High Court, Lalita v. Tata Iron & Steel Co., the Tata Iron and Steel Company, Court, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Taxes, Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tata, Tribunal

MONEY: twenty six per cent, fifty per cent

ORDINAL: 1st, 2nd, first, second, third, second

PERCENT: 100%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //