Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ganpatram Dinaram Agarwal Vs. Mt. Rambai W/O Bechharam

Decided On : Aug-04-1949

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 221, Section 211, Under Section 154, Section 155

PRODUCT: ORDERHemeon J.1, 767

PERSON: Ganpatram, Bilaspur, Misbrilal, Rameshwar, Bambai, Rameshwar, Ratanlal, Abdul Ghafur v., Abdul Ghafur, Gulam Basul, Abdul Eau, Scott-Smith J., Sundara Aiyar J, Govinda Pillai, Knox J.

NORP: Ra, Ra, A.I.R.

CARDINAL: 300, 200, 211, 600, 6, 600, 35-8, 2, 3),hiserat, 1, 3-00, Two, 211, 13, 527, 6, 28, 325, 26, 14, 13, 779, 25, 235, 687, 19

ORDINAL: First

ORG: Extra Additional Sessions, the convio-tiona, Extra Additional Sessions, the Law of Crimes, Crown, Swaminatha Thevan v. Emperor, L.J. 303, the Allahabad High Court, Court, Court, Empress, Parwari

GPE: Bilnapur, Kota, H9, Rambai, EB, Rambai, Rambai, Bambai, Rambai, Rambai, L.J., I.C., Emperor, Mishrilal, Emperor

DATE: 22nd May 1947, two months, 1925, A.I.R. 1924, 1239, 16 Mad

TIME: the previous night

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //