Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-i, Bombay Vs. Kamini Kaushal
Decided On : Jun-27-1978
Court : Mumbai
LAW: the I.T. Act
GPE: Kantawala, assessee, Delhi, Delhi
ORG: the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Lloyd's Bank of India, ITO, ITO, Navkala Niketan, Navkala Niketan, Union Bank, Lloyds Bank, Masuri Films and Finance Ltd., the Union Bank, Masuri Films and Finance Ltd., ITO, AAC, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Lloyds Bank, Union Bank of India Ltd., Navkala Niketan for Rs, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Masuri Films and Finance Ltd., Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Reliance, the Supreme Court, CIT, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Lloyds Bank, Union Bank of India Ltd., Navkala Niketan, Tribunal, Masuri Films and Finance Ltd., Tribunal, Navkala Niketan, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal
DATE: 1922, year 1954-55, April 1, 1953, March 31, 1954, December 7, 1953, December 12, 1953, April 16, 1957, February 28, 1958, April 29, 1958, November 28,1953, November 17, 1953, December 7, 1953, March 19, 1959, December 7, 1953, 1973]87ITR370(SC, 1973]87ITR370(SC, March 19, 1959
CARDINAL: 2, 25,000, 3, 25,000, three, two, 25,000, 35,000, 4., 25,000, 5, 25,000, 25,000, 6, 9, 25,000, 25,000, 25,000, 10
PERSON: Kamini Kaushal, Rameshkumar Vyas, Naraindas Lakshmichand, Naraindas Lakshmichand, Navakala Niketan, Joshi, S. P. Jain, S. P. Jain's, Naraindas Lakshmichand, R. K. Vyas
ORDINAL: second