Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. the Buckingham and Carnatic Company Limited

Decided On : Oct-25-1935

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 66, the Indian Companies Act, the Indian Companies Act, follows:-Rs, Section 10, section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 2, Section 2, the Section 10, Section 10, Section 2, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10

PERSON: Lancelot Sanderson, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Massey, Madras, Madras, Madras, Massey, Massey, Massey, L.R. 104, Madras, Madras, Rosan Lal Coal Company, Ltd., Pat, Madras, consideration.38, Madras, Madras, aside.40, Majesty

NORP: J.1, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

ORG: the Commissioner of Income-Tax, the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, follows:-5, The Buckingham and Carnatic Company, Limited, Massey & Co., Ltd., the High Courts, Patna, the High Court, the High Court, the Buckingham and Carnatic Company, Limited, the Buckingham Mill Company,, Limited, the Carnatic Mill Company Limited, the Jamalmadugu Press Company, Limited, the Tiruppur Press Company, Limited, the Tadpatri Cotton Press Company, Limited, the Buckingham and Carnatic Company, Limited, Patna High Courts, the High Court, Massey & Co. Ltd., the Buckingham and Carnatic Company, Limited, Limited, Company, Company, the Buckingham and Carnatic Company, Limited, The High Court, the Buckingham and Carnatic Company, Limited, The High Court, High Courts, Legislature, Board, the High Court, Lordships, Massey & Co. Ltd., the High Court's, the Madras Engineering Works Limited, Massey and Company Limited.(2, the Madras Engineering Works Limited, The High Court, the Madras Engineering Company, Massey and Co., Lordships, Income Tax, Bombay, The Saraspur Mills Co., Ahmedabad I.L.R.(1931, S.C. 34 Bom, the High Court, Massey & Co. Ltd., assessse, Motiram, the High Court, the Bombay High Court, Massey & Co. Ltd., Lordships, Patna High Courts, Lordships, the High Court, Massey & Co., Ltd., Lordships, the High Court, the High Court, Lordships

LOC: Madras, Madras, Madras

DATE: May 2, 1934, 1922, 1922, the tax year, April 1, November 29, 1920, 1876, December 3, November 30, 1920, 15,10,845Buildings, 1921-1922, that year, 1931-32, 1928, November 29, the year 1921-22 to 1930-31, those years, each year, each year, years, years, 1922, any year, that year, the following year, that year, that year, years, 1886, the years, 1922, 12, May 2, 1934

CARDINAL: 1931.3, 1913.6, five, five, five, 1888.8, 1920.9, five, 11,11,748Other, 25,73,6.0310, five, five, five, five, five, 56, 451, 3, 1928.16, 2, five, 19, three, three, 4.-In, 2, five, 2, 1, 2, 10, 2, 2, two, two, 2, three, two, 56, 129, 2, 2, five, 2, five

GPE: allowed.13, companies.15, Bombay, Bombay, rules.22, Bombay, Bombay

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, firstly, secondly, third, first, first, second, second, first, second, second, third, fourth, first, first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //