Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Versova Koli Sahakari Vahatuk Sangh Ltd. Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Decided On : Jan-12-1968

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 61, section 23, section 2(11, section 52, section 61, Section 2(11, Section 3, section 3, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11, section 2(11

DATE: J. 1, 1959, 1925, the year 1959-60, 1959, 28th January, 1961, 29th March, 1962, 1959, 19th July, 1963, 1959, 1967, 1967, 1959, the year, the year 1959-60, 1959, 1956, 1958, 1925, 1963, 1030, 1968, 23rd November, 1967, 1932, 1959, 1959, 1967, 1967, 1967, 1967, 1967, 1959, 1959, 1959

ORG: the Bombay Sales Tax Act, Court, Society, the Bombay Co-operative, Society, Society, Society, Society, Society, Society, Society, Society, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, Society, Society, Society, Society, Sales Tax, the Sales Tax Tribunal, Sales Tax, Society, the Sales Tax Tribunal, Court, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, Court, Tribunal, Court, Society, Society, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, State, State Government, State, the Supreme Court, The State of Gujarat, the Supreme Court, Sales Tax, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, Society, Society, Society, Society, Society, Society, Society, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, State, Bombay v. Ahmedabad Education Society, Gondwana Club, State, the Bombay Co-operative Societies Act, Young Men's Indian Association (Regd, the Supreme Court of India, Enfield India Ltd., Canteen Ltd., Society, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, the Supreme Court, The State of Gujarat, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Calcutta, Board of Revenue, Calcutta, Calcutta, Government of India, the Bengal Finance, the Raipur Manufacturing Co.'s, the Supreme Court, Travancore Rubber and Tea Co., the Bombay Sales Tax Act, the Bombay Sales Tax Act, Unnecessary, the Bombay Sales Tax Act

CARDINAL: two, 2., 12,000, 3, two, two, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 30,000, 19, 1, 20, 520, 1, 2, 3, 30,000, two, 1, 2, two, 7, 497, 9, 450, two, one, 14, 21, 317, two, 19, 1, 9, 8, 19, 1, 20, 398, 6, 9, 19, 20, 520, 10, 2, 2, 1, 2, 11, 250, 100, 12

QUANTITY: 32,819.61 nPs

ORDINAL: third, first, first, second, first, firstly, secondly, first, first

PERSON: Raipur, Quilon, B. C. Joshi, B. C. Joshi, R. J. Joshi, R. J. Joshi, R. J. Joshi, R. J. Joshi, R. J. Joshi, Nagpur v. Sales Tax, R. J. Joshi, Madras, R. J. Joshi, R. J. Joshi, Raipur, Raipur, J.

WORK_OF_ART: Travancore Rubber and Tea Co.

GPE: Chagla, The State of, Gujarat, West Bengal, Sikri, Ramaswami, Ramaswami

FAC: the Nagpur Bench

LOC: Madras

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //