Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Tatyagouda Ranoji Patil Vs. MohodIn Sultan Mullain

Decided On : Jul-27-1934

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 47, the Watan Act, IndAp 37

PERSON: J.1, I.L.R, Adarkar, Adarkar, Adarkar, Sadashiv Lalit, Jayantibai I.L.R, Tokhan Singh, L.R. 318, Nandy, Biseswar Lal Marwari, Rajaram, Digambar v. Hari, L.R., L.R., Ganu, L.R., Kalipad Sarkar v. Hari Mohan Dalal, I.L.R, Chidambaram Chetty I.L.R, Adarkar, Order XXI, Ram Kirpal Shukul, Rup Kuari, L.R., Velusami Tevar, Gangadhar, Jagmohandas Varjivandas, Shamrao

ORG: Belgaum, Mulla, Court, Sections 10 and 11, Purshottam Talvar, Mudkangavda Shidangavda, Court, Courts, Court, Privy Council, Lala Tripati Prakas, Court, Chhaganlal, Ettiyapuram, Court, Raja of Ramnad, Court

CARDINAL: 743, 700, 1, 175, 420.4, 8, 185, 353, 3, 55, 23, 131, 29, 33, 11, 345, 32, 627, 675.7, 11

DATE: October 9, 1922, 1883, 1883, 1901, 1931, 1926, 1909, 1930, 1398, 1916, 1920, October 6, 1923, March 20, 1929, March 21, June 27,1929, 1883, 1931)33BOMLR781

GPE: Bhivashi, mullanki, watan, watan, Singh, I.L.R, Bhagdari

TIME: under that Act

ORDINAL: second, third, first, first, first, first

WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate

PRODUCT: the Crown Grants Act

MONEY: 1931)33BOMLR797 .8

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //