Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bhawoo Jivaji Vs. Mulji Dayal

Decided On : Mar-22-1888

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 99, the Indian Penal Code, Section 342, the Indian Penal Code, Section 52, the Penal Code, Section 79, the Penal Code, Section 99, Section 54 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Act X, Section 342, the Penal Code, Section 99, Section 52, the Penal Code, Section 55, Section 54, Section 54, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 8 of Act XIII, Section 54(5, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 342

ORG: Birdwood, J.1, Magistrate, Girgaum, Magistrate, Court, Gujarathi, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Court of Revision, Court, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, not.3, Magistrate, Court, Inspector Saunders, Gujarathi, Venkatrao 7 Bom, State, Magistrate, the Commissioner of Police, Magistrate, Gujarathi, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate

GPE: Bhatia, Bombay, I.L.R., England

CARDINAL: three, about 6-30, two, 197, 4 A.M., three, 1860).4, 50, one, 4, About 6-30, 7, three, One, one, 79, 4, One

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first

PERSON: Dhobi Talav, Shek Saheb Badrudin, Nobin Krishna v. Rassick Lall I.L.R. Cal., Beg, H.C. R. Cr, J.6, Complainant

TIME: four hours, the morning, the morning of the 29th, a usual hour, 35 of Act XIII, hours

LANGUAGE: English, English, English

DATE: 8 Bom, 1047, 1882).5, four months', 76, 1882, 1856, 1856, many years past

FAC: the Arthur Crawford Market

NORP: European

EVENT: the Penal Code

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //