Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Vallabhdas Mulji Vs. Pranshankar Narbheshankar
Decided On : Mar-01-1932
Court : Mumbai
LAW: the General Rules, the General Rules, the Judicature Act, Order 65, Rule 14, Order 65, Order 65
PERSON: Blackwell, Nos, Nos, byFawcett J., Fawcett, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nagindas, Nos, Hathibhai Harishanker, Nos, determine.4, Charles Sargent, lien, Jefferson, Bhaishankar, Dinsha I.L.R., lien, L.R. 1196, lien, Order VIII, lien, lien, Taylor, Popham, Eldon, Langdale M. R., Edwards, Reg, Hil, Blakey v. Latham, Kay J., lien, Graves, L.R., Brown, Chitty, Edwards, lien, Bhupendra Nath Bhose v., J., Edwards, lien, Kay J., lien, Blaky, Latham, Kay J., lien, lien, lien, Setalvad, lien, lien, Nos
CARDINAL: 1, 2,680, 1, 5, 2 to 5, 1, 1, 6, 8, 1, 6, 8, 2 to 5, 2, 5, 1, 5, 1, 5, 2,680, 2,680, 27,832, 1, 5, 5, 54,641, 1, 1, 1, 5, 248, 23, 127, 855, 29, 529, 93, 14, 15, 75):-The, one, 79, 6, 304, two, 306):-Where, 35, 16, 3S, 14, 14, 48-8-10, 20, 14, 926, 10, 41, 518, 521):-If, one, 139, 140, 932, 1,451-9, 1,431-8, 14, one, 1, 5
DATE: 4, 7, 7, March 15, 1926, March, 1926, 4, November 8, 1927, 4, 4, February 13, 1931, 4, April 2, 1931, 4, June 13, 1931, 4, 1886, 1927, the year 1832, 1832, 1853, 1832, 1853, 1873, 1832, 1808, 1843, 1885, 70, 1853, 63, 1879, 1889, 1872, 1916, April 30, 1915, August 10,1915, August 24, 1915, 1885, 4
PRODUCT: defendantsNos
ORG: Court, Court, the High Courts of, English Courts, the Appeal Court, Tyabji Dayabhai & Co., Jetha Devji & Co., I.L.R., Mulla, the General Rules, follows:-No, the General Rules, Court, a Court of Equity, Court, Cattell v. Simons, Q.B.D., Smith J, The Divisional Court, the Appeal Court, The Appeal Court, Brett M.R., Bolls, theJudicature Acts, Court, Calcutta, Sassoon & Co., I.L.R., Plaintiff, Q.B.D., Court, Tyabji Dayabhai & Co., Jetha Devji & Co.
GPE: Devkabai, 253):-It, India, India, England, England, England, Pringle, Chaudhuri, India, Blakey v. Latham, India, India, Hen
ORDINAL: 9th, First
NORP: said:-I, D., action.15, English
WORK_OF_ART: B Very