The Secretary of State for India Vs. Bhaskar Krishnaji Samant

Decided On : Apr-07-1925

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 74.4, Section 75, Exhibit 24, Section 18, the Indian Contract Act, Section 5, the Indian Contract Act, Section 25, the Indian Contract Act, Section 5, Section 75, the Indian Contract Act, Section 75, Section 84, Section 84, the Indian Forest Act, Section 5, the Indian Contract Act, Section 25, the Indian Contract Act, Section 84, the Indian Forest Act, the Indian Contract Act, the Indian Contract Act, the Indian Forest Act, Sections 15, Chapter XIII, Section 75, Section 77, Section 84, Section 74, the Indian Contract Act, Section 75, the Indian Contract Act, Section 5, the Indian Contract Act, Section 25, Section 75.20, the Indian Contract Act, Section 84 of the Act, Section 74, the Indian Contract Act, Section 84, Section 84, Section 84, Section 84, Section 84, Section 84, Section 84, Section 98, Section 80, Section 75, Section 81, Section 75 and Section 7, Section 75, Section 77, Section 5, the Indian Contract Act, Section 77, Section 77, the Indian Forest Act, the Indian Forest Act, Section 5, the Indian Contract Act, Section 5, the Indian Contract Act, Section 25, Section 25, Section 25, Section 84, the Indian Forest Act, Section 84, the Indian Forest Act, Section 77, the Indian Forest Act, Section 98, the Indian Forest Act, Section 75 of the Act, Section 77, Section 84, Section 5, the Indian Contract Act, the Indian Contract Act, Section 25, the Indian Contract Act, Section 5, the Indian Contract Act, the Indian Contract Act, Section 75, the Indian Contract Act, Section 107, Section 75, Section 75, Section 77, Section 84,]50, Section 14 of Act V, Section 25, the Opium Act, Section 84, Section 84, Section 84.]55, Section 74, the Indian Contract Act, Section 84, the Indian Contract Act, Section 25', Section 84, the Indian Forest Act, Section 75, Section 75, Section 5 or 25, the Indian Contract Act, the Indian Contract Act, Section 84, Section 15, Section 75, Chapter XIII, Sections 15, Section 84 of the Act, Section 84, the Indian Contract Act, Section 77, Section 12, the Cattle Trespass Act, Section 75, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 84, Section 84.70, Section 98, Section 75, the Indian Forest Act, Section 77, Section 84, Section 74, the Indian Contract Act, Section 75, Section 84, the Indian Contract Act, Section 5, the Indian Contract Act, Section 84, the Indian Forest Act, Section 84, Section 84, the Indian Contract Act

ORG: Shah, Ag, The Divisional Forest Officer, Western Division, Block No, the Divisional Forest, the Conservator of Forests, the Divisional Forest Officer, the Conservator of Forests, the Conservator of Forests, the Divisional Forest, the Local Government under Section 75, the Indian Forest Act, the Forest Department, the Indian Forest Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Forest Department, Court, the Forest Department, Court, Department, State, Councilor, State, Advocate General, Advocate General, the Indian Forest Act, the Indian Forest Act, the Indian Forest Act, Government Notification, Court, Courts, Advocate General, the Advocate General, Court, the Indian Forest Act, follows:-The Local Government, Forest, Advocate General, the Indian Forest Act, the Indian Forest Act, the Indian Forest Act, the Indian Forest Act, the Indian Forest Act, Act.18, Advocate General, the Indian Forest Act, Q.B. 293, Garnett v. Bradley, the Indian Forest Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Divisional Forest Officer, Western Division, the Divisional Forest, the Divisional Forest, the Conservator of Forests, Samant, Samant, the Forest Department, the Forest Department, Department, State, State, State, The Advocate General, Advocate General, Local Rules, the Indian Forest Act, the Indian Forest Act, Government Notification, Council, BO, follows:-The Local Government, the Local Government, Advocate General, the Indian Forest Act, the Conservator of Forests, Courts, the Local Government, Maxwell, Court, the Forest Department, Department, Institute of Patent Agents v. Lackwood, Legislature, London County Council, Bermondsey Bioscope Co., Parliament, Government, the Forest Department, Forest, Forest, Court, State, Letters, Kanga, Advocate General, S.B. Patkar, the Conservator of Forests, Government, Institute of Patent Agents, A.C. 347, London County Council, Bermondsey Bioscope Co., L.J. K.B. 141, Garnett v. Bradley, Vide the Report of the Proceedings in Council, Clauses, 6th Edn, e. g , Section 70, Garnett v. Bradley, Q.B. 293, London County Council, Bermondsey Bioscope Co., L.J. K.B. 141, Letters Patent, Velji Bhimsay & Co., the Divisional Forest Officer, Western Division, Block No, the Divisional Forest, the Conservator of forests, The Conservator of Forests, the Indian Forest Act, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Letters Patent, the Indian Forest Act, the Government Notification, Council, Forest, Reliance, Maxwell, the Divisional Forest Officer, the Conservator of Forests, Sections 5 and 25, the Indian Forest Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Letters Patent, J.87

PERSON: Thana, V3 Did, agreement8, Desai, Kubulayat, Forest Officer, Forest, Gazette, Rockett v. Clippingdale, Desai, Kincaid, J.26, Thana, Kriehnaji Bhikaji Samant, KB, Samant, Samant, Samant, Samant, Desai, Forest Officer, Forest, Gazette, Desai, Richardson J.'s, Deora v Dooli, Sethia, quam pereat.37, Desai, Gazette, Gazette, Herschell, Lord Alverstone, Samant, Samant, Macleod C. J., Pleader, Rockett v. Clipping, A. G. Desai, Vol, XXIX, e. g., C.J.54, Vide Maxwell, Baker, L.R., Kincaid J., Roakett v. Clippingdale, Garnett v. Bradley, Roakett v. Clippingdale, A. G. Desai, Dasai, Bachoo Bhaidas, Thana, rejected.71, Justice Shah, Justice Kincaid, Gazette, Forest Officer, 6th Ed.

DATE: June 25. 1920, August 5, 1920, August 5, 4-30, that day, August 6, September 3, 1920, October 15, 1920, October 29, November 18, December 14, 1920, April 19, 1921, April 21, August 5, 1920, 1878, office.10, 1878, 1878, 1890, '2799, the 31st March 18U6, 1896, 84, 25, 31, 85, 41, 1872, 1891, 1878, June 25, 1920, August 5, five and a half per cent, 1921, the same day, August 6, August 10, November 18, 1920, November 27, December 10, April 12, 1921, November 1920, April 21, 1921, August 5, 1920, 1872, 1878, 1878, 1890, 2790, March 31, 1896, 1878, every day, twenty years, 1891, '39, 1910, 1878, 1878, 1890, 1875, 1918, 25, 31, 1872, 25, 31, 35, 41, 51, 1921, 53, 1878, 1910, 1780, 1903, 1891, June 25, 1920, August 5, 1920, August 5, 4-30, that day, October 15, 1920, October 29, November 18, December 14, 1920, April 19, April 21, 1921, August 5, 1920, 1878, '74, 1872, 1890, 1918, 1908, 1878, 1890, 2799, March 31, 1896

LOC: the Thana District, Circle, the Bassein Range, the Thana District, Circle

CARDINAL: 4, 12,299, 5, 5, one-fourth, 2,246, 1921.2, 1,000, 500, 6, 2., 3, 4, 5.4, 600, 4, 1,0, 8,000, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1,000, 3, 1, 5, 5, two, 4, 5, 5, 4, 4, 5, 4, 1, 1, 1,000, one thousand, one-fourth, 1, 125, two, one, 25, 51, 75 to 77, 5 and 25, 2, 944, 50, 2, 4, 4, 12,299, 1,000, 4, 5, 5,000, 4, 2,246, 2,246, 12,299, 575, 1,000, 800, 1,000, 170, 11, 6, 5,000, 955, 982):-The, one, 481, 2, 357, 1894, 347, 27, 1910)89, 5, One, 5,000, 1894, 27, 141, 80, 1891, 2, 944.53, 84, 43, 15, 6, 41,51, 70, 70, 74, 523, 24, 944, 969, 1891)2, 80, 2, 293, two, 1, 4, 12,299, 5, 5-22, 7, one-fourth, 2,246, 1921.68, 1,000, 1, 20, 523, 5,000, 200, five, 1,000, five, 200, 1, four

TIME: 7 p. M

EVENT: the War-Bond for Rs, the War-Bond of Rs, the War-Bond of Rs, a War-Bond of Rs, Sections 5, the Sunday Observances Act, the War-Bond for Rs, the War-Bond of Rs

GPE: law.5, India, Clause, Bombay, Rookett v. Clippingdale, A.C., India, S.C., BB, Clauses, Kanga, Kanga, him.81, Us, Us

ORDINAL: second, first, first, 5th, Secondly

QUANTITY: 1 am, 3 App, 3 App, One Act, 3 App, 141 e. g.

NORP: Statute, Indian, Indian, Indian

PRODUCT: words:-I