Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hirachand Succaram Gandhy Vs. G.i.P. Railway Company

Decided On : Mar-19-1928

Court : Mumbai

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 149, Rule 10, Section 32, Order VII, Section 26, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 26, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 14, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 57, Order VII, Rule, Section 14, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 3, Clause, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 32, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 80, Section 15, the Indian Limitation Act, the Indian Railways Act, Section 80, Section 77, Section 3, Clause, Section 140 of the Act, Section 77, Section 3, Clause, Section 77, Section 140, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 77, the Indian Railways Act, Section 77, the Indian Railways Act, Section 140, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 77, Section 140, the Indian Railways Act, Section 80, Section 77, the Indian Railways Act, Section 77, Section 80, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, the Indian Railways Act, Section 80, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 11, the Indian Railways Act, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 80, Section 77, the Indian Railways Act, Section 77, the Indian Railways Act, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 77, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Courts Act, Section 80, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 15, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 14, the Indian Limitation Act

GPE: Patkar, Sholapur, India, Hedlot, India, Council, India, India, Sukhnand, India, India, Council, India, India, India, India, India, India, J.12, India, Sholapur, Sukhnand, India, Council, Hedlot

NORP: J.1, Eastern

CARDINAL: two, 4 and 11, 1925.2, 10, 331, 10, 1, 15, 10, 30, 90, 21, 1000.4, 6, 2, 5, 112, 297, 26, 113, 392, 18, 239, 1927)29BOMLR1227, 2, 140, 6, 6, 6, 306, 16, 22):-I, 6, 140, 279, 392, two, 140, two, two, two, one, 10, 27, 297, 26, 30, 90, 15, 1927)29BOMLR1227, two

ORG: the Court of the First Class Subordinate, First Class Subordinate, Court, State, Council, the District Court, District Judge, Court, the District Court, the District Court, Court, State, State, Bombay Act VI of, Court, Bombay Civil Courts Act, XIV, Government, State, the District Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the District Court, the District Court, the District Court, Order IV, the District Court, Court, Court, Bimala Prosad Mukerji, C.W.N., State, State, the Indian Railways Act, Government, State, State, Council under Section 79, the Government of India, State, the Government of India Act, Oriental Steam Navigation Co., State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, Council, Bhagchand, State, Privy Council, Lordships, Madhavrav, P.J., the District Court, Government, Government, Government under Section 8, Clause, Notice, State, Council, the Traffic Superintendent, the District Collector under Section 80, Government, the Traffic Superintendent, Government, the Traffic Superintendent, State, Railway Administration, the Railway Company, the Railway Company, Government, the Indian Railways Act, State, State, State, State, Council, State, State, Legislature, State, the Court of the First Class Subordinate, State, Council, State, the Bombay Civil Courts Act, the District Court, Court, the District Court, State, State, the Subordinate Court, State, Court, State, State, the Bombay Civil Courts Act, State, the District Court, State, the Subordinate Court, the District Court, the Calcutta High Court, C.W.N., Court, Court, Court, C.L.J., the District Court, Compare Bhagchand, State, State, State, the Subordinate Court, Court, State, the Subordinate Court, State, the Subordinate Court, the District Court

DATE: March 10, 1925, June 29, 1925, July 1, 1925, September 1925, 1901, 1926, 1926, 1869, every year, 1911, 1925, 1914, 1915, 1861, 1923, 1912, 1916, 1897, 1890, 1896, sis months, six months, six months, 1896, six months, six months, six months, six months, 1916, six months, six months, 1916, July 1, 1925, 1924, July 1925, 1923, 1920, 1925, 1911, 1916, 16, 1926, 1925

PERSON: Railway, Order XXII, Abdul All, Order XXII, Narsibhai, Lal Moni Devi, Mohidin Rowthen, Nallaperumal Pillai, Fawcett J., Shamlal v. Oudh, L.R., Kalekhan I.L.R, Gulam Rasul, I.L.R, L.R. 243, Rajlucki Debi, Maharana Shri, Fatesingji Jasvatsingji, P.J. 129, I.L.R, Radha Shyam Basak, Chatterjee J. observes, Perumal Pillai, Gulam Rasul, I.L.R, Baker, Railway, Order XXII, L.R., Shamlal v. Oudh, L.R., Lal Moni Devi, Radha Shyam Basak, Railway

EVENT: the Civil Procedure Code, the Civil Procedure Code, Bombay Act VI

PRODUCT: Chunnilal, Anandrav

ORDINAL: first

MONEY: 1242):-The Act

WORK_OF_ART: The Collector of Kolaba

LOC: The Amod Municipality, Great Indian Peninsula

FAC: the Great Indian Peninsula Railway, Bimala Pvosad Mukerji

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //