Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Narandas and Sons

Decided On : Oct-23-1985

Court : Mumbai

LAW: section 18, Chapter IV, Section 18, Section 28, section 8, section 10, section 8, section 10, section 10, section 8, section 18, section 25(3, section 6, section 25(3, section 8, section 10

GPE: Kania, Bombay, us

PERSON: Actg, Jetly, Jetly, Jetly.5, Mehta, Mehta, Mehta, Palkhivala, Mehta, Mehta, Mehta, Mehta

CARDINAL: three, two, 4, one, 1978]115ITR587(Bom, 1957]32ITR688(SC, 589, 1959]36ITR279(Bom, 38,43,000, 4, 28,718, 28,718, 1957]32ITR688(SC, one

MONEY: 256(1

DATE: 1961, years, years 1963-64, 1964-65, 1922, 1961, 1961, 1922, 1961, 1922, 1922, 1922, 1961, 1961, 1943, 1942, 1943, 1944, November 7, 1947, 1922, 1922

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

ORG: Government, Government, Appellate, Appellate, Tribunal, Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Government, CIT v. Narandas & Sons, the Supreme Court, United Commercial Bank Ltd., CIT, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, M/s. Narandas & Sons, Shree Jagdish Mills Ltd., CIT, the Baroda Excess Profits Ordinance, Baroda State, Government of India, the Accountant-General, the Baroda Excess Profits Fund, the Accountant-General, the Accountant-General, the Accountant-General, the Accountant-General, the Accountant-General, the Division Bench, the Accountant-General, the Accountant-General, us.8, the Supreme Court, CIT, Chugandas & Co., intereston securities, the Supreme Court, United Commercial Bank Ltd., CIT, Government

PERCENT: 90%

WORK_OF_ART: Ordinance

ORDINAL: 1965]55ITR17(SC