Rachangauda Irangauda Patil Vs. the Secretary of State for India

Decided On : Aug-04-1919

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 61, Section 4(a, Section 61, the Watan Act, Section 13 of the Act, Section 60, Section 2, Section 7, Section 4(a)(1, Act X, Section 4, Section 65

PERSON: Vatandar Patil, L.R., Vatander Patil, Talikot, Rachangauda Irangauda, Talikot, L.R., Regulations XVI, Regulations, J.5, L.R., Statute

ORG: State, the Bombay Hereditary Offices Act, Court, the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, the Government of India:--Held, the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, the Government of India, the East India Company, State, State, the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, the High Court, State, the Government of India Act, the Government of India, State, a Civil Court, East India Company, East India Company, East India Company, the Courts of the East India Company, Southern Mahratta Country, Land Revenue, Civil Courts,, Council, Council, Court of law.4, Heaton, the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, State, the East India Company, the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act

DATE: 1874, 1876, August 1914, 1874, 1912, 1858, 1827, 1852, 1858, 1876, 1912, the year 1858

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 1852.Secretary, 15, sixteen, 23, 3, 1, 15, 15, 106

GPE: India, the District of Bijapur, India, Vatan, India, India, Council, Inam, Estates, Bombay, India

LOC: Vatan

ORDINAL: 26th

EVENT: Bombay Act No

NORP: Deccan, Kandeish, Inams, Inam

FAC: the Governor-in