Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mahadev Packaging Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Decided On : Dec-29-2003

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Section 11A, Section 11A, Section 11A(1, the Central Excise Act, Section 11A, Section 11A, Section 11A(1

CARDINAL: 2, 3,08,810.06, 1, 229/15/97, 27.2.97, 142, 604, 27.2.97, 27.2.97, 106, 473, 84, 900.The, 27.2.97, 21.5.99, 1, 1, 6, 142, 604, 27.2.97

ORG: the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Revenue Department, Board's Circular No, the Commissioner (Appeals, Board's Circular, Tribunal, Gopal Mills, CCE, Tribunal, Board's Circular, Board's Circular No, Tribunal, CCE v. A.B.B. Ltd., ELT, CCE, Conductors Pvt. Ltd., Tribunal, Board's Circular, etc.7, Gopal Mills, CCE, the Decision of the Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, The Commissioner (Appeals

DATE: 4.3.99, 27.2.1997, the period of, six months, 2002, 1999, 1999, 1944, six months, six months, Five years, 2002

NORP: Central Excise

WORK_OF_ART: Section 11A. Recovery

PERSON: Chandigarh

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //