Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Mahadev Packaging Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce
Decided On : Dec-29-2003
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: Section 11A, Section 11A, Section 11A(1, the Central Excise Act, Section 11A, Section 11A, Section 11A(1
CARDINAL: 2, 3,08,810.06, 1, 229/15/97, 27.2.97, 142, 604, 27.2.97, 27.2.97, 106, 473, 84, 900.The, 27.2.97, 21.5.99, 1, 1, 6, 142, 604, 27.2.97
ORG: the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Revenue Department, Board's Circular No, the Commissioner (Appeals, Board's Circular, Tribunal, Gopal Mills, CCE, Tribunal, Board's Circular, Board's Circular No, Tribunal, CCE v. A.B.B. Ltd., ELT, CCE, Conductors Pvt. Ltd., Tribunal, Board's Circular, etc.7, Gopal Mills, CCE, the Decision of the Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, The Commissioner (Appeals
DATE: 4.3.99, 27.2.1997, the period of, six months, 2002, 1999, 1999, 1944, six months, six months, Five years, 2002
NORP: Central Excise
WORK_OF_ART: Section 11A. Recovery
PERSON: Chandigarh