Bhimsen Hanmant Vs. the Urban Bank

Decided On : Mar-01-1946

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 59(1, Section 54, the Societies Act, Section 59, Section 54, the Societies Act, Article 182, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 181 of the, Article 181, Article 182, Article 182(5, the Societies Act, Section 54, Section 59(1, Section 54, Section 59, Section 59(1, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 182, Article 181 applies, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 59(2, Article 181, Article 181 of Schedule, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 54, Article 181 since the award, Article 182, Article 181, Section 54, the Societies Act, Section 54, Article 181 of the Indian Limitation Act, Section 54, Article 181, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 54, the Societies Act, Section 54, Section 59(1, the Limitation Act, Section 54, the Societies Act, Section 59(1, Section 59, the Societies Act, Article 182, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 181 or 182, Section 54, the Societies Act, Article 182, Section 54, the Societies Act, Article 182, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 59(1, the Societies Act, the Indian Limitation Act, Section 59(1, the Societies Act, Article 182(5, the Limitation Act, Section 59, the Societies Act, Section 59(1, Article 182(5, Article 182(5, Article 182(5, Article 182, Article 182, Article 182.7, Section 15, the Indian Arbitration Act.8, Article 183, the Indian Limitation Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 15, the Indian Arbitration Act, Article 181, Section 48 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 15, Article 183 of the Limitation Act, Article 183, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 181, the Societies Act, Section 15, Article 183, Article 181, Section 15, Section 51, Article 182, Article 181, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Limitation Act, Section 48, Article 182, Article 181, Article 181 fixes, Section 48, Section 59, Section 54, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Indian Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Article 182 or 183, Article 182 of the Limitation Act, Article 181, Article 182.12, Section 59, Rule 11, the Code of Civil Procedure under O. XXI, Section 39, Section 43, Rule 34, Section 39 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 39', Section 39 of the Code, Section 59, Section 54, the Societies Act, Section 59(1)(b, Section 59, Article 181, Section 48, Article 182 of the Limitation Act, Section 59, Section 59 and Section 59A., Section 59(1, Article 182 of the Limitation Act, Section 59, the Societies Act, Section 59, Section 59, Section 59(1, Article 182 of the Limitation Act

PERSON: Gajendragadkar, J.1, Registrar, Gururao Bodhrao Bengeri, Baker, Baker, Guledgud, L.R., Registrar, Maratha Co-, L.R. 889, Rangnekar, Justice Rangnekar, Rangnekar, Rangnekar J. the Collector, N.J. Wadia, Chaitram Sagormull, Gajraj Sheokarandas, Subba Rao v. Calicut Co-operative, Rule XV(7, Ramdutt Ramkissen Das I.L.R.(1922, O. XXI, O. XXI, Rule, Krishnaji Shridhar, Mahadeo Sakharam, L.R., Subba Rao's, Somabhai Govindbhai, L.R.

CARDINAL: one, five, 451-3, 270, 1, 196, 1, thus:-(1, two, 182, 5, 301, 301, 0, one, 38, 927, 928, 928, 40, two, 1, 499, 15, 504, two, One, 182, 183, 649, 650, 182, 181, 651, twelve, two, 1, 1, 17, 23, 181, 40, 1

ORG: the Bombay Co-operative, The Urban Bank, Registrar, Registrar, the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division, Muddebihal, Court, Registrar, Registrar, out,(a, Registrar, a Civil Court, Registrar, The Hubli Urban Co, Society, Beaumont C.J., N.J. Wadia J., the Division Bench, Letters Patent Appeal, the Hubli Urban Co-operative, Society, Society, Society, the Letters Patent Appeal, Letters Patent Appeal, Beaumont C.J., N.J. Wadia J., Registrar, Beaumont C.J. ', Registrar, Court, Court, Court, Registrar, Court, Registrar, Court, Registrar, Court, Beaumont C.J., the Hubli Urban Co-, Society, Court, the Hubli Urban Co-, Society, Court, Credit Bank, Bench, Wadia, Court, the Bombay Co-operative, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Beaumont C.J., the Urban Bank at Muddebihal, Hardwari Mull & Co., Court, Court, Rankin C.J., Court, Nadirshaw Contractor, the High Court, Court, Court, Beaumont C.J., Court, Beaumont C.J., Rankin C.J., Calcutta, Urban Bank, the Madras Co-operative Societies Act, Court, Court, Leach C.J., Societies Act, Legislature, the High Courts of Calcutta, Court, Sassoon & Co., Legislature, Court, Sections 38, Court, Court, Court, Court, Macleod C.J., the Poona Court, the Poona Court, the Poona Court, Legislature, Registrar, Legislature, Leach C.J., Court, Registrar, Beaumont C.J., Parliament, Legislature, Court, Credit Bank, Legislature, Beaumont C.J., Registrar, the civil Court

DATE: 1925, September 21, 1930, October 25, 1930, February 19, 1932, September 11, 1933, 1934, September 18, 1934, 1932, three years, 1943, 1943, 1935, 1933, 1931, January 30, 1935, 1931, 48, 1935, April 22, 1931, March 12, 1932, three years, 1937, March 1927, July 1931, a period of, three years, 1941)43BOMLR1006, twelve years, 1007, some years, 1940, 1912, three years, 39, 48, three years, twelve years, twelve years, three years, 1091, 1937, 1943, 1943

MONEY: 121/2 per cent

ORDINAL: first, Second, second, first, secondly, first, second, first

PRODUCT: Articles 181, Calcutta

FAC: the Societies Act.3, the Limitation Act.5

GPE: S.A., Bench, Raghavendra v. Industrial Bank, Dharwar, Keshav, N.J., Raghavendra, Raghavendra, Raghavendra, Raghavendra, Bombay, Emperor, Dharwar, Keshav, Raghavendra

WORK_OF_ART: Bench

LOC: Madras