Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mani D. Seervai ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra (Through the Secretary Ministry of Urban Department) and ors.

Decided On : Dec-22-2000

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Draft Development Plan, Section 154, section 47, section 91, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Development Plan, the Development Plan, the Development Plan, Section 91, Section 39, Section 92 and section 92, the Development Plan, the Development Plan, the Development Plan, Section 39, Section 92, the Development Plan, the Development Plan, section 39, section 92, Section 86, the Development Plan, Section 88

PERSON: S. Radhakrishnan, force-, Dorabji Pestonji Seervai, Dorabji Pestonji Seervai, Plot Nos, D. P. Seervai, Plot Nos, Faredun D. Seervai, D. P. Seervai, Seervais, Plot Nos, Plot Nos, D. P. Road, Seervais, Seervais, Seervais Informing, Plot Nos, Seervais, Nos, R. J. Chinai, M. M. Chinai and, Plot Nos, Seervais, Seervais, Misc, Seervais, Seervais, F. S. I., Seervais, 83A/2, Santacruz T. P. S. No, 83A/2, Plot Nos, 83A/2, Road, Seervais, Award, Plot Nos, Seervais, Misc, Seervais, Seervais, Seervais, D. P. Road, 83A/2, Suit Nos, D. R. C., D. P., D. P. Nos, C. T. S. No, Plot Nos, Seervais, Seervais, T. D. R., Plot Nos, D. P. Road, Seervais, Petitioners, Gazette Notification, 83A/2, Seervais, Seervais, Seervais, Seervais, Dada, 7 Seervais, Seervais, Judicially, Submission IVFor, B.M.C., Plot Nos, 83A/2, B. M. C., 27.9.1974, Seervais, Seervais, Municipal Taxes, Dada, Dada, Wednesbury, K. M. C. Abdulla & Co., Dada, Ramakrishnan Kulwant Rai, Tulzapurkar, M. R. T. P. Act, Tulzapurkar, M. R. T. P. Act, Tulzapurkar, Dungarlal Harichandra v. State, Affidavit, Affidavit, Petitioners, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Sudhar Samiti, Tulzapurkar, Jaipur v. Daulat Mat Jain, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, K. Ramdas Shenoy v., Tulzapurkar, Petitioners, Tulzapurkar, The M. R. T. P. Act, D. P. Road, Tulzapurkar, Petitioners, Tulzapurkar, Petitioners, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Notification, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Seervais, Tulzapurkar, Seervais, M. R. T. P. Act, Tulzapurkar, D. P., Tulzapurkar, Dungarlal Harichandra v. State, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, C. J. Sawant, Seervais, Tulzapurkar, Sawant, R. M. Sawant, Pleader, Tulzapurkar, Seervais, Seervais, Dada, Tulzapurkar, M. R. T. P. Act, M. R. T. P. Act, Dada, Tulzapurkar, Instant, Seervais, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar, Tulzapurkar

ORG: Petitioners, Town Planning Scheme, Santacruz Town Planning - II, the Santacruz Town Planning - II Scheme, Plots 77-C, Plot Nos, Plot Nos, Chinais, Plot No, Jehangir D. Seeravi, Plot No, Petitioners, Recreation Ground, the Draft Development Plan, Chinais, the Second Variation of the Santacruz Town Planning Scheme No, the Final Development Plan of 'H' West ward, Plot Nos, the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, Corporation, the Decisions/Awards, Petitioners, Plot Nos, Tribunal, Court, the Final Development Plan, the State of Maharashtra, the Bombay Municipal Corporation, the Executive Engineer, Town Planning, Corporation, Chinais, Plot Nos, Plot Nos, Petitioners, the City Civil Court, Petitioners, Corporation, Petitioners, Corporation, Petitioners, Corporation, Court, Court, Corporation, Recreation Ground, the Draft Revision of the Development Plan for H-West Ward, Plot No, the Southern Portion of 83B/4 to 83B/8, The Draft Revised Development Plan, Maharashtra State Government Gazette, Town Planning, the Town Planning Schemes, Implementation of the Development Plan, the Draft Development Plan, Chinais, Plot Nos, I., Court, the Final Revised Development Plan, The Final Revised Development Plan, Plot Nos, the Draft Revised Development Plan, Corporation, D. C. Rules, Sanctioned Town Planning Scheme, Scheme, Corporation, the T. P. Scheme -Plan Nos, Petitioners, Corporation, Petitioners, Petitioners, the Building Construction Plan, Petitioners, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Chinais, Court, Arbitration, Court, Petitioners, the Ministry of Urban Development, Plot Nos, Corporation, Corporation, Petitioners, Revised Development Plan, Chinais, Petitioners, Counsel for the Petitioners, The Santacruz Town Planning Scheme No, Seervai, Chinais, The Impugned Third Variation, Chinais, each Chinai Plot, T. P. Scheme, Individual, the State Government, Plot Nos, Chinais, Seervais, The Property Register Cards, the Executive Engineer's, Bills, Counsel for the Petitioners, Judgment of a Division Bench, Court, State of, the Development Plan, the Town Planning Scheme, the Apex Court Judgment in Punjab Communications Ltd., Union of India, Court, Counsel for the Petitioners, Apex Court, State, the State Government, Central Excise v. M/s., Chinai, Petitioners, the Town Planning Scheme, Maharashtra Regional and, a Town Planning Scheme, a Town Planning Scheme, the High Court, Scheme, Court, Third Variation to Town Planning Scheme, Petitioners, The Executive Engineer, The Bombay Municipal Corporation, the Executive Engineer, Respondents, Respondents, this Hon'ble Court, Petitioners, the Executive Engineer, Respondents, Affidavit, Respondents, the Executive Engineer, the Third Variation, the Town Planning Scheme, the Second Variation of the Town Planning Scheme, Respondents, the Town Planning Scheme, the Third Variation, Petitioners, Petitioners, Hon'ble Court, the Town Planning Scheme, the Town Planning Authority, Town Planning Authority, The Town Planning Authority, the Second Variation, the Town Planning Scheme, The Town Planning Authority, Counsel, Dwarkadas Marfatia & Sons v. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, the Supreme Court, Parliament, Harijan Layout, the Statutory Authorities, Apex Court, Jaipur Development Authority, Government, the Executive Engineer, Associated Cement Companies Ltd., State of, Rajasthan & Anr, Government, Town Municipal Udipi & Ors, the Supreme Court, Bangalore Medical Trust, Muddappa & Ors, the Third Variation, the Town Planning Scheme, the Third Variation, the Town Planning Scheme, a Town Planning Scheme, the Town Planning Scheme, the Development Plan, Development Plan of 1967, The Second Variation, the Town Planning Scheme, the Town Planning Scheme, Development Plan, the Third Variation, the Town Planning Scheme, the Town Planning Scheme, Development Plan, the Town Planning Authority, Development Control Regulations, the Town Planning Scheme, Development Plan, the Town Planning Authority, Petitioners, the Second Variation, the Town Planning Scheme, the Second Variation, the Third Variation, the Town Planning Scheme, Petitioners, the Town Planning Scheme, the Town Planning Authority, the First Variation, Variations, the Town Planning Scheme:- Area of Seervai's Land, Variation13719.50137123.After2nd Variation2345.006704.After3rd Variation6454.004378.50It, Affidavit, the 2nd Respondents, Petitioners, the 4th Respondents, the Third Variation, the Town Planning Scheme, Petitioners, Petitioners, the Town Planning Authority, Government, the Third Variation, the Town Planning Scheme, Revised Development Plan, Petitioners, Illegitimate, Petitioners, Union of India, Hindustan Development Corporation, Petitioners, 2nd Variation, the T. P. Scheme, The Municipal Corporation, Creator Bombay & Anr, The Advance Builders (, Petitioners, Arbitrators, the T. P. Scheme, the Planning Authority, Petitioners, the 3rd Variation, Seervais, Scheme, Seervais, Corporation, inter alia, the Corporation In Writ Petition No, the Respondent Municipal Corporation, the Town Planning Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, the Respondent Corporation, Town Planning Scheme, the Planning Authority, Scheme, Sec, the Town Planning, Scheme, the State Government, Town Planning Scheme, Petitioners, Petitioners, the Town Planning Scheme, the Town Planning Scheme, Development Plan, the Town Planning Scheme, the State Government, Town Planning Scheme, the Town Planning Scheme, Town Planning Scheme, the State Government, Town Planning Scheme, Counsel for the Petitioners, the Town Planning Scheme, Town Planning Scheme, Petitioners, The Respondent Corporation, Executive Engineer's, the Respondent Corporation, Petitioners, The Town Planning Authority, Petitioners, Petitioners, Town Planning Scheme, Petitioners, State, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay v. Advance Builders, the Supreme Court, Scheme, the Supreme Court

ORDINAL: Third, first, eighth, first, second, 5th, 3rd, third, third, third, third, third, third, Third, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 5th, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, 4th, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, 4th, 4th, 4th, 4th, 4th, third, third, second, third, third, third, third, third, 5th, second

DATE: 8th July, 1998, 22nd September, 1999, 1st October, 1922, the year 1944, 94 and 83, about 1943, 7, 6th January, 1962, 15th October, 1966, 11th January, 1967, 1966, 14th April, 1969, 21st March, 1974, 27th September, 1974, 83A/2, about 1975, 1977, 1982, December, 1976, 6th December., 1979, 26th December, 1979, 83B/8, 1981, 21st March, 1974, September, 1974, 83B/8, 14th April, 1981, 1981, 14th April, 1981, 1981, 1981, 1977, 27th August, 1982, 21st April, 1983, 30th April, 1984, 24th April, 1984, 6th December, 1979, 13th November, 1986, about 1987, 83B/8, 1238/1987, 1239/1987, 16th July, 1987, 18th January, 1991, February, 1992, 7th May, 1992, 1981-2001, 83A/2, 6th December, 1979, 13th October, 1992, 2nd March, 1993, the year 1994, 83A/2, 3rd May. 1993, 15th June, 1993, 30th November, 1996, 2nd August, 1997, 15th October, 1993, 2048/1993, 2048/1993, 7th January, 1994, 28th February., 1995, 12th December, 1995, 28th February, 1995, 17th January, 1996, 6th December, 1979, 19th October, 1996, 8th July, 1998, 6th December, 1979, 18th August, 1998, 15th October, 1998, 27th May, 1996, 9.11.1998, 18.11.1998, 6th December, 1979, 22nd September, 1999, 22nd September, 1999, 15th February, 1978, 1978, 1974-1978, 26 years, 1953, pre-1978, about 26 years, 1978, 59. 61. 67, 68, 72, 74, 1979, 1981, 1312, 1979, 1312, 83B/1, 22nd September, 1980, 1966, 32, 6th December, 1979, 6th December, 1979, a period of, 20 years, 1993, 1998, 1993, the year 1979, the year 1999, the year 1978, the year 1978, 1967, '40, the year 1957, the year 1978, the year 1992, the year 1978, 1992, 1991, 1992, 44, 1992, 46, 49, 1993, 1993, 54, 56, 57, 58, 13712 sq.metres, 61, Section 86(3, 63, 6th December, 1979, nearly twenty years, November, 1993, 1993, a period of, six weeks, today

CARDINAL: 2, 78, approximately 54,633, 83, 83, 83, approximately 13,712, 83, approximately 13,719, 3., about 1952-53, 83, 8, 83, 1, 2, 10, 8, 83, one, seven, 8, 83, 83, 83, 83, 2, 83, 83, 44, 83A-2, 5, 2, 1, 2, 83B/8, 2, 6, 83B/9, about 335, 83B/7, 83B/8, 83B/8, 83B/9, 2, 593, 1, 2, 8, 9, 83B/9, 83B/9, 335, two, approximately 935, 377, 10, approximately 12,400, 11, 13, 2, 13, 13, 13, 12, 13, 13, 593, 44, 13, 14, 3, 23, 15, two, two, two, two, 16, two, 1, 83A/8, 17, 1, 18, 1 to 4, 4, 83, 3, 83B/8, 19, 5, 20, 1, 1, 13, 1, 1, 83B/8, 21, 1, 83B/8, 1, 22, 5, 1, 23, 27.5.1999, 28.7.1999, 24, 1, 25, one, 335, 2, 7, 9, about 922, about 2369.25, 2/9, 7/9, 82 and 86, 8, 15.2.1978, 12,400, 13.712, two, 8, 21.3.1974, 8, 8, 8, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 33, 34, 2048, 2, 16,462, 35, 36, 37, 28, 39, 41, 13,263.36, two, 935, 377, 1270.5, 21, 42, 13,719.50, 2,345, 6,454, 670, 13,712, three, 45, 3, 47, 48, 50, 51, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 52, 53, 55, 92, 13719.50, 2345.00, 2345.00, 13719.50, 4378.50, 59, 86(3, 62, 64, 4, 66, 67, 2, 1.10.2000, 28.10.99

PERCENT: 83-B/1, 85%, over 15%, 15%, approximately 85%, 85%, 85%, 83 B/1, 85%, 85%, 85%, 85%, the 15%, the 15%, 85%

LOC: Plot Nos, Southern Side, a Municipal Garden, Suit No, Plot Nos, a Municipal Garden, the South West, Affidavit, Petition

GPE: Scheme, Bombay, alia, Bombay, Chinais, Mumbai, R.G., the B. M. C., Chinais, West Ward, Red, Kerala, Asstt, the M. R. T. P. Act, Jurisdiction, Gujarat, Chinai, B. M. C., Chinais, Chinais, Gujarat, Counsel, Chinais, the M. R. T. P. Act, the M. R. T. P. Act, B. M. C., Gujarat v. Shontilal

MONEY: 83A/2, 83A/2

FAC: Muktanand Park, Chinais, Chinai, Chinais, Reply of Sunil Tolaram Kukreja, Regulation 11(4

NORP: D., D. R., T. D. R., Plot, Mandamus, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners

PRODUCT: Architects, Coporation, Seervais, Agreement, Agreement, Notifications, Arbitrator

WORK_OF_ART: Plan, Scheme, Plan, Scheme, the Agreement of 1979, Scheme

QUANTITY: 44 feet, 2331.65 sq. metres, 6454.00 sq. metres, 6454.00 sq. metres

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //