Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Maganbhai Nathabhai Vs. Dinkarrao N. Desai

Decided On : Mar-04-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Legal Practitioners Act, Section 36, Section 36(1, the Legal Practitioners Act, Section 36(2A, the Explanation to Section 36(1

PERSON: Rangnekar, Mody, client3, Dahyabhai Antoldas, Broach, Magan Natha, clerks.4, Taluka, Dahyahhai Antoldas Vakil, Bent, Dahyabhai Antoldas, Magan Natha, Mody, Mody, Pleader, Thakor

CARDINAL: 1, one, 107, 1, 2, 3, 4, one, 3, seven, 2, only fifteen, eleven, 3, three, more than one, 1, at least three, 1, 2, 3, One

FAC: Maganlal Nathabhai

ORG: Broach under Section 36, Court, the Government of India Act, the Bar Association, Explanation, the Broach District Bar Association, Association, -1, the Bar Association, the Secretaries of the Association, the Broach District Bar Association, Bar, the High Court, Sub-Divisional Magistrates, the Government of Bombay, Resident Magistrates, Sub-Divisional Magistrates, the Bar Association, Court, the Broach District Bar Association, Association, Association, Court, Court, follows:-The, Court, Court, the Bar Association, Court, Court

DATE: 1879, April 15, 1929, Monday April 22, 1929, April 7, 1919, the day, April 23, 1929, Thursday April 26, 1929, April 15, 1329, April 25, 1929

GPE: District Judgeto, the Broach District, it.7

LOC: Magan Natha

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //