Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Emperor Vs. Girdhardas Liladhar
Decided On : Jul-03-1933
Court : Mumbai
LAW: the Indian Stamp Act, Section 62(1)(b, Section 65, Section 30, Section 65, Section 62, Section 65, Article 53 of the first, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 65, Section 30, Section 30, Section 62(1)(b, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 65, Section 65, Section 62(1)(b, Section 61, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 64, Section 58, Section 58, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, Section 62(1)(b, Section 30, Section 30, Section 65, Section 65, Section 62(1)(b, Section 65(a, Section 62, the Indian Stamp Act, Section 65, Section 62(1)(b, Section 65, Section 62, Section 65, The Indian Stamp Act, Section 62, Section 65, Section 65, Section 30, Section 65 of the Act, Section 65
PERSON: W. Baker, Muttirulandi I.L.R., Mohun Chowdhry, correct.5, J.6
CARDINAL: two, two, 50, two, two, 78-6, one, two, two, two, two, one, 11, 329, twenty, 324, 61, 64, two, two, 65, 50, 141, two, 500, 100, two, two
ORG: Magistrate, Third Court, the International Watch Company, the International Watch Trading Company, the International Watch Company, R.F. Davar, R.F. Davar, the International Watch Company, Court, the Small Cause Court, the Calcutta High Court, Sections 62, Davar, Magistrate, the International Watch Company, Davar, the International Watch Company, the Watch Company, the International Watch Company, the International Watch Company, Magistrate, Criminal Revisional Application No, Calcutta High Courts, the International Watch Company
GPE: Bombay
LOC: Europe, Madras
DATE: July 1929, January 31, 1931, July 4, 1929, February 1931, April 25, 1932, 1884, Mad., 1887, 1900, 1879, 65, 1933, 62
ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, second, first, first, second
WORK_OF_ART: Reference under Stamp Act, Queen-Empress