The State of Maharashtra Vs. L.D. Kanchan and Others Etc.

Decided On : Nov-03-1988

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Corruption Act, Chapter IX Penal Code', Section 14, the Penal Code, a Central Act, the Companies Act, Section 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Companies Act, the Banking Regulation Act, the Banking Regulation Act, the Banking Regulation Act, Section 14, Section 14, the Banking Regulation Act, Section 14, the I.P.C. Section 2 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, the I.P.C., the Corruption Act, the Companies Act, the Banking Regulating Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, a Central Act, the Companies Act, the Indian Penal Code, a Central Act, Constitution, the Companies Act

ORG: ORDER1, the Indian Overseas Bank, Byculla Branch, the Court of the Special Judge, the Central Bureau of Investigation, the Indian Overseas Bank, S. 5(2, the Prevention of Corruption Act, S. 5(2, the Central Bureau of Investigation, the State of Maharashtra, Court, Counsel of the respondents, Counsel, Chap, LJ, S. 46A Banking Regulation Act, S. 21 I.P.C.'6, Advocate General, the State of Maharashtra, S. 617, Chap, State of Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Supreme Court, S. 617, the Banking Companies (Amendment) Act, the State bank of India Act, Sections 10, 13 to, the State Bank of India, Bank, Regional Rural Bank, the Central Government, S. 46A, Bank, Chap, Chap, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Respondents, Chap, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Delhi High Court, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Delhi Development Authority, Act Government, the Central Government, State Government, the Central Government, State Governments, the Central Government, S. 617, Banking Companies, Central Bank of India, Central Government, a Nationalised Bank, the Kerala High Court, the Delhi High Court, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Delhi Development Authority, the Kerala High Court, the Allahabad High Court, LJ, Haryana High Court

PERSON: Nos, L. D. Kanchan, Greater Bombay, S. M. Daud, N. Vaghul v. State, Cri LJ 385, N. Vaghul's, Justice Daud, Mahesh Jethmanlani, Justice Daud, Justice Daud, Jethmalani, Justice Daud, Justice Daud, Agrawal v. State, Kurian v. State, Kundan Lal Sharma v., Bobde, M. V. Narasimhan, S. C. Agrawal v. State, Kundanlal Sharma v. State of Punjab, Greater Bombay

CARDINAL: 44 and 50 of 1978, 1, 465, 468, 471, 420, 2, 1, 20, 1, 2, 21, 1, 2, one, two, 14, 19-7-1969, 15, 19, 23, 3, 31, 35, 1, 46, 53, 51, two, one, 1947.10, less than fifty-one, one, 1, 3, 4, 1, 2, 4, 21, 12

GPE: Bombay, Bombay, Counsel, U.P., Kerala, Clause, Clause, Kurian v. State, Kerala, Art, Bombay

DATE: the months of April to July, 1977, 467, 1947, 14th August, 1987, 1987, 1987, 1949, 1970, 1980, S. 14, 1979, 1949, 1970, 1980, 1956, 1958, 1964, 1947, S. 12, 1949, 1956, 1949, 1955, 17, 34, 35, 36, 48, 50, 52, 1970, 1976, S. 3, 1970, 1970, 1980, S. 46A, 1970, 1980, 1982, 1949, 1956, 1956, 1970, 1980, 1970, 1947

ORDINAL: twelfth, first, twelfth, twelfth, twelfth, twelfth, twelfth, twelfth, twelfth

PRODUCT: Cri LJ 385, Cri LJ 2230, 922

WORK_OF_ART: S. 21 Clause, Criminal Amendment Acts, the Commencement of this Act

EVENT: the Penal Code

NORP: S. 5(1)(d, Punjab