Bhagwandas Atmasingh Bajaj Vs. Gulam MohiuddIn M. Sayyed and Another

Decided On : Mar-09-1981

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, Chapter XXII, Chapter VII, the I.T. Act, the Finance Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, Chapter XXII

PERSON: Chandurkar, Keshavdas Dalpatrai, s. 138, Keshavdas, Keshavdas, Orissa, Nazir Mohammad v. Jamila Bibi, Keshavdas

NORP: J.1, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian

GPE: Insolvency, I.T., Bombay City-V, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, I.T., notification.12

CARDINAL: two, 10,000, 1, 10,000, 1965, 57, 2, 137, 137, 137, 138(2, 2, follows:'(2, 1, three, two, 34A, 1949.9, 34A, two, 250

ORG: the High Court, Piramal Chambers, Parel, ITR, the Central Government, the I.T Dept, the Central Government, the Official Gazette, the Orissa High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court

DATE: November 19, 1971, September 29, 1978, 1961, under s. 138(2, 1961, June 23, 1965, 1961, 1961, 1922, 1922, 1922, 1949, 1949, 1961, 1964, April 1, 1964, 1872, April 1, 1964, April 1, 1964, 1961, 1922, 1922, 1922, 1949, 1922, 1922, 1972]85ITR342(Orissa, three weeks

ORDINAL: 7th, first, second, first, second

LOC: the Central Govt, the Central Govt, companies.10

FAC: the India Income-tax Act