Govind Dhondshet Kolwankar Vs. the Chiplun Municipality

Decided On : Feb-11-1932

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Bombay Act III, Section 9, Section 27, Section 37, Section 40, Section 46, Section 50, Section 46 of the Act, Rule 114, Rule 120, Rule 116, Section 42 of the Act, Section 42, Section 42, Section 42, Section 42, Section 42, Section 167 of the Act, Section 167, Section 167, Section 167, Section 42, Section 42, Section 42, Section 42, Section 99, Section 167 of the Act, Rule 83, Section 167, Section 167, Section 42

PERSON: John Beaumont, Kb, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Broomfield, Bapat, Bapat, Bapat

GPE: Kt., the Chiplun Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality, Municipality

ORG: Ratnagiri, Tankale, Tankale, Tankale, Court, Court, Tankale, Tankale, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Parliament, the Bombay District Municipal Act, Court

PERCENT: theChiplun Municipality

DATE: 1928-24,2, the years 1922-23, 1901, 42, one month's, six months, more than six months, six months, July 19,1924, 1923-24, 1901, some days, one month's, six months

CARDINAL: 681-8-6, 116-4, 177-8, two, 42, 167, one, 95, 25, 113, Two, 80, one, four, 42 and 50, one, One, one

FAC: the Bombay District Municipal Act

ORDINAL: first, third, first

NORP: J.1

EVENT: Bombay Act III, the Civil Procedure Code

LOC: the Chiplun Municipality