Subhodhchandra Popatlal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax/Excess Profits Tax, Bombay North, Kutch and Saurashtra, Baroda - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Aug-28-1953

Court: Mumbai

LAW: Section 10(2)(x, Section 10(2, Section 10(2, Section 10(2)(x, Section 10(2, Section 10(2, Section 10(2)(xv, Section 10(2).When, Section 10(2)(x, Section 10(2)(xv, Section 10(2, Section 10, Section 10(2, Section 10(2)(x, Section 10(2, Section 10(2

CARDINAL: one, 22,751, 2, three, one, two, three, one, two, three, 3

GPE: Sarabhai, Sarabhai, Sarabhai, Sarabhai, Sarabhai, Sarabhai, Sarabhai, Sarabhai, Clauses, Clauses, Clauses, Clauses, Clause, Sarabhai, Sarabhai, Clauses, Clauses

DATE: year 1900, 1990, 1995, from 1996, 1993, Samvat years 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, the year, the year

PERSON: Ho, xv, xv, xv, xv, Palkhiwala, xv, Palkhiwala, x).6

ORG: Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Legislature, Legislature, Tribunal, Legislature, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Clauses, Tribunal, Legislature, Tribunal, Tribunal, Legislature, Clauses, Tribunal

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, second