Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Indian Radio and Cable Communications Company Limited Vs. the Comminissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Apr-08-1937

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 10(2)(ix)?2, Section 66(2, Section 10(2)(lx).It, the Indian Companies Act

PERSON: John Beaumont, Wheither, Rangnekar, J.6, Majesty, Maugham, J.8, Rangnekar J., Latter, Macmillan, Adamson, Majesty

GPE: Kt., India, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, India, India, India, India, Bombay, India, India, Clause, India, India, London, Bombay, Clause, India, Bombay, India, Iraq, India, India, India, India, India, Iraq, Bombay, Bombay, India, India

ORG: the Commissioner of Income-tax under Section 66(2, the Imperial and International Communications Ltd., the English Company, Council, the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, the High Court, the Imperial and International Communications Ltd., the Communications Company, the Eastern Telegraph Company Ltd., China Telegraph Company Ltd., the Communications Company, The Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, Madras, the Communications Company, Karachi, Radio Company, the Communications Company :-(a, Karachi, the Communications Company, the Radio Company, the Radio Company, the Communications Company, Rupees, the Board of Directors, Radio Company, the Radio Company justify.(2, the Radio Company, the Radio Company, the Radio Company, the Communications Company, the Radio Company, the Radio Company, Telegraph Companies, the Government of India, the Radio Company, Income Tax, Reserve, the Radio Company Income Tax, the Communications Company, Radio Company, the Communications Company, the Radio Company, the Communications Company.(3, the Radio Company, the Radio Company, Reserve Fund, Rupees, 7)(c, Communications, The Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Indian Government Telegraph Department, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, Communications, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Indian Government Telegraph Department, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, the Communications Company under Clause, the High Court, Court, Lordships, the Communications Company, Lordships, the High Court, the Communications Company, the Communications Company, Communications, Lordships, The Union Cold Storage Company, Lordships

NORP: Indian, English, Indian, English, English, English, English, Indian, Indian

DATE: 1922, February 19, 1932, March 28, 1935, 1922, 1922, the year, March 31, 1934, February 19, 1932, 1922, 1913, 1932, February 19, 1932, December 31, 19.44, quarterly, the thirty- first March, the thirtieth June, the thirtieth September, each year, six weeks, fourteen days, Annual, such financial year, each year, December 31, 1944, December 31, 1944, the year 1933-34 ended March 31, 1934, the financial year, February 22, 1934, the year, the year, the year, years, 1931

CARDINAL: half, 5, half, one-half, half, half, half, half, 5, two, two, less than half, 3, 5, ninety thousand, four, One-half, half, 6, ninety thousand, half, ninety thousand, 6, 3, 11, one-half, 5)(a, one-half, more than one, 10,000, 1,000, only 9,000, half, 3, 16, 293.30

MONEY: eighty per cent, 10 per cent

PRODUCT: Shareholders

WORK_OF_ART: Revenue.(2

LOC: Madras, the Persian Gulf, the Persian Gulf, Madras

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //