Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Janabai Govind Surve Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others
Decided On : Oct-20-1990
Court : Mumbai
LAW: Section 92A of the Motor Vehicles Act, the Division Bench, Section 111A of the Act, Chapter, Section 111A of the Act, Section 111A of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14 of the Constitution
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 306(3, 5, 6, 7 to 10, 45,000/-deposited, 4, 79, 306(3, 57, 306(3, 5., 306(3, 1, 6, 306(3, 306, 3, 110, 110E, 306(3, 306(3, 306(3, one, 306(3, 8, 2, 9
DATE: 19th March 1987, 1984, 1959, 19th March, April 1984, the same day, April 1984, 1984, 19th March 1987, 19th March 1987, six years, quarterly, 1985, 1983, quarterly, 31st January 1983, 19th March 1987
PERSON: Greater Bombay, Dnyaneshwar, Nos, Nos, Petitioner, C.S. Dharmadhikari, V. S. Kotwal, Rule 306(4, Ajarambhai Harijan, Ajarambhai Harijan v., Rule, Shinde, Rule, Rule, Rule, Greater Bombay, Greater Bombay
ORG: Tribunal, the Bombay Motor Vehicles Rules, under.2, Chowpatty, J. J. Hospital, Tribunal, pan-bidi, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Court, Nav Bharat Builders, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, the High Court of Gujarat, United India Insurance Co. Ltd., the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the High Court of Gujarat, Union India Insurance Co. Ltd., High Court, Court, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, under:--, State Government, Sections, a Claims Tribunal, a Civil Court, Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Civil Court, the State Government, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the State Government, the State Government, a Claims Tribunal, the State Government, The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Motor Accident ClaimsTribunal, the Petitionerand the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, BarAssociation
ORDINAL: 3rd, 3rd, third, first
GPE: Bombay, Pyarabai, Muljibhai, Mulibhai, Gujarat, Counsel, Counsel
TIME: about 10 p.m.
NORP: Rules, Rules